Proving Kineric Energy with Force and Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcgerrity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between force, distance, and kinetic energy, specifically how exerting a force over a distance results in kinetic energy expressed as F*D. The theorem of kinetic energy variation states that the change in kinetic energy equals the work done by external forces, leading to the equation KE=F·D. Participants also explore a related problem involving a crane lifting a steel beam, questioning the safety of lifting under different conditions of speed and acceleration. Key calculations involve determining the tension in the cable and the maximum mass the crane can lift safely. The conversation emphasizes applying fundamental physics concepts like force and acceleration to solve real-world problems.
rcgerrity
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
so my teacher likes to confuse me on purpose, here's the first question:

the kineric energy of a moving object is definted as 1/2MV^2 where M is the mass of the object and V is its velocity. Show that if I exert a force F on an object while it moves through a distance D, its kinetic energy will be F*D.

PLEASE HELP ASAP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rcgerrity said:
so my teacher likes to confuse me on purpose, here's the first question:
the kineric energy of a moving object is definted as 1/2MV^2 where M is the mass of the object and V is its velocity. Show that if I exert a force F on an object while it moves through a distance D, its kinetic energy will be F*D.
PLEASE HELP ASAP!

1.Are u familiar with the concepts of "work","kinetic energy","potential energy"??
The theorem of kinetic energy variation states that the variation of the kinetic energy of a body is equal to the work done on it by the external exerting forces.
Since the variation of kinetic energy is is equal to the energy in the final state,and the work is defined as the product between the force and the distance,the theorem states:
\Delta KE=W \Rightarrow KE=F\cdot D

2.If not,use the definition of force (F=ma) and Galilei's formula
v_{fin}^{2}=v_{init}^{2}+ 2aD.
Multiply by "m",take the initial velocity 0 (as before) and divide by 2,to get the same answer.

Daniel.
Daniel.
 
Last edited:
i have another one for ya, thanks so much by the way

a crane is raising a steel beam(mass 350 kg) the maximum tension the supporting cable can take without breaking is 7000 N
a) is it safe to life the beam at a constant speed of 3 m/s? prove answer
b) the crane operator becomes impatient and turns up the power so that the beam is accelerating upward at 6 m/s^2. is the cable able to carry the load?
c) what is the heaviest beam the crane can safely lift with the acceleration of 6 m/s^2?

thanks so much!
 
This should be in the homework forum and I'm sure one of the mods will move it.The problems are not for me,are for you to solve.
What are your ideas to solving the problem??You're not expecting me to solve it for you,without a part of the work from you as well.

Daniel.
 
physics

i was just hoping for a little help, i have ideas.

for a, i was attempting to use f=ma, but i get stuck b/c i don't exactly know what to do with the acceleration then b/c its speed not acceleration that i am testing
 
For 'a)',what is the tension in the string??
For 'b)',what is the tension in the string.??
For 'c)',what is the tension in the string,what is the maximum mass it can lift??

Daniel.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top