Proving Limit of Sequence: a1, b1, a2, b2,... Converges to L

  • Thread starter Thread starter matrix_204
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the interleaved sequence a1, b1, a2, b2,... converges to L if both sequences an and bn converge to L. A proposed proof involves defining a new sequence cn based on the original sequences and using the epsilon definition of limits. It is suggested that for any epsilon, there exist indices N and M such that both sequences are within epsilon of L, allowing the conclusion that cn also converges to L. Some participants express uncertainty about the necessity of demonstrating boundedness, while others clarify that it is not required to prove convergence. The consensus is that the proof is valid as long as the conditions for convergence are met.
matrix_204
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
i had this problem in my book that i wasn't able to do. I kinda had the idea of what it involved but just wanted to clear it up with you guys.
So the problem is:
Suppose that an ->L and bn ->L. Show that a1,b1,a2,b2,... converges to L.

So here it seems to me like i can obviously define a new sequence cn, like that in the pinching theorem. But using other definitions(epsilon, etc.) of sequences, how do i come up with a proof of this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fix an epsilon. That a_n and b_n converge to L implies there is some N (take each sequence individually, choose an M and M' for each, take the bigger of the two and double that) such that whenever n>N both a_(n/2) and b_(n/2) are within epsilon of L (and therefore c_n is within epsilon of L).
 
Last edited:
could someone check this proof for me and tell me what is missing as i m not sure if i know anymore:(problem stated above)
Proof:
If a_n ->L and b_n ->L for some L, then for any eps>0 there is a K such that for all n, if n>K, then |a_n - L|<eps/2 and |L - b_n|<eps/2.
Since n>K, |a_n - b_n|</= |a_n - L| + |L - b_n|<eps/2 + eps/2 =eps.
(now to show that it is bounded)
If eps=1, then |a_n - b_n|<1 for some n>K.
This means |a_n - b_K+1|<1 for all n>K.
Thus {a_n:n>K} and {b_n:n>K} are bounded.
So a_n ->L and b_n->L.
-------
 
I don't think you have to show anything is bounded. That will follow automatically once you prove the limit is L. What you want to do is define the sequence by \{c_n\}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} by c_n=a_{[(n+1)/2]} if n is odd and c_n=b_{(n/2)} if n is even. Now fix an epsilon > 0. There are N and M such that whenever n>N, a_(n+1)/2 is within epsilon of L and whenever n>M b_(n/2) is within epsilon of L. Take the bigger of the two, let's say it is P. Then whenever n>P, both a_(n+1)/2 and b_(n/2) are within epsilon of L. That is, whenever n>P, c_n is within epsilon of L.
(sorry for the sloppier version of this above)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top