Proving Limit of Sequence: a1, b1, a2, b2,... Converges to L

  • Thread starter Thread starter matrix_204
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the interleaved sequence a1, b1, a2, b2,... converges to L if both sequences an and bn converge to L. A proposed proof involves defining a new sequence cn based on the original sequences and using the epsilon definition of limits. It is suggested that for any epsilon, there exist indices N and M such that both sequences are within epsilon of L, allowing the conclusion that cn also converges to L. Some participants express uncertainty about the necessity of demonstrating boundedness, while others clarify that it is not required to prove convergence. The consensus is that the proof is valid as long as the conditions for convergence are met.
matrix_204
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
i had this problem in my book that i wasn't able to do. I kinda had the idea of what it involved but just wanted to clear it up with you guys.
So the problem is:
Suppose that an ->L and bn ->L. Show that a1,b1,a2,b2,... converges to L.

So here it seems to me like i can obviously define a new sequence cn, like that in the pinching theorem. But using other definitions(epsilon, etc.) of sequences, how do i come up with a proof of this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fix an epsilon. That a_n and b_n converge to L implies there is some N (take each sequence individually, choose an M and M' for each, take the bigger of the two and double that) such that whenever n>N both a_(n/2) and b_(n/2) are within epsilon of L (and therefore c_n is within epsilon of L).
 
Last edited:
could someone check this proof for me and tell me what is missing as i m not sure if i know anymore:(problem stated above)
Proof:
If a_n ->L and b_n ->L for some L, then for any eps>0 there is a K such that for all n, if n>K, then |a_n - L|<eps/2 and |L - b_n|<eps/2.
Since n>K, |a_n - b_n|</= |a_n - L| + |L - b_n|<eps/2 + eps/2 =eps.
(now to show that it is bounded)
If eps=1, then |a_n - b_n|<1 for some n>K.
This means |a_n - b_K+1|<1 for all n>K.
Thus {a_n:n>K} and {b_n:n>K} are bounded.
So a_n ->L and b_n->L.
-------
 
I don't think you have to show anything is bounded. That will follow automatically once you prove the limit is L. What you want to do is define the sequence by \{c_n\}_{n\in \mathbb{N}} by c_n=a_{[(n+1)/2]} if n is odd and c_n=b_{(n/2)} if n is even. Now fix an epsilon > 0. There are N and M such that whenever n>N, a_(n+1)/2 is within epsilon of L and whenever n>M b_(n/2) is within epsilon of L. Take the bigger of the two, let's say it is P. Then whenever n>P, both a_(n+1)/2 and b_(n/2) are within epsilon of L. That is, whenever n>P, c_n is within epsilon of L.
(sorry for the sloppier version of this above)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top