Proving Limit of sin (n!*R*π) for Rational R

  • Thread starter Thread starter happyg1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the limit of sin(n!*R*π) approaches zero for rational R. The user rewrites R as a/b and identifies that for n=b, all subsequent terms will be zero, indicating convergence. They initially struggle with the definition of a limit and how to relate epsilon to their variables. Eventually, they realize that including b in their calculations is crucial for understanding convergence. The conversation highlights the importance of algebraic manipulation in limit proofs.
happyg1
Messages
304
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Here is my dilemma: I am to prove that sin (n!*R*pi) has a limit, where R is a rational number. I rewrite R as a/b and I can see that whenever n=b, every subsequent term will be zero. I have tried to write this out using the definition of a limit, but I can't seem to break it down. I have been looking at these problems for a long time and I am blocked on this one.
Thanks in advance,
CC
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a sequence a_n, we say that a_n \rightarrow L if for every \epsilon > 0 we can find an N(\epsilon) such that | a_n - L | < \epsilon for n > N(\epsilon).

You have guessed correctly that the limit is 0. Now I give you an \epsilon and ask you to tell me where I should start looking so that the terms of the sequence are always closer than \epsilon to the limit. Tell me where to look by giving me N. You've already pointed out that the terms of the sequence equal the limit beyond a certain point ...
 
Last edited:
hey,
I think I got it. I wasn't including my b in the expansion of the n! as the spot where the sequence converges. I couln't relate the epsilon to the b or the n. It's just the algebra. That's what was giving me the headache. I had been doing the ones that are all polynomials and my brain was fried.

CC
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top