Proving Linear Independence: If v\notin\left\langlev1,...,vk\right\rangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter annoymage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Independent Linear
annoymage
Messages
360
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If v11,...,vk,v are linear independent, prove that v\notin

\left\langlev1,...,vk\right\rangle


Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



i can prove it by contrapositive, but I'm curious how to proof it with

"If v11,...,vk,v are linear independent" in the beginning,

any idea? T_T
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I really cannot read what you have here.

Are you trying to show that "if \{v_1, v_2, \cdot\cdot\cdot, v_k, v\} is linearly independent, then v is not in the span of \{v_1, v_2, \cdot\cdot\cdot, v_k\}&quot;?<br /> <br /> Since proof by contradiction works nicely, why look for a &quot;direct&quot; proof?
 
i'm just curious, maybe there is a way that i don't know,

anyway, you wrote

"<br /> \{v_1, v_2, \cdot\cdot\cdot, v_k, v\}<br /> is linearly independent"

is it the same thing as "<br /> v_1, v_2, \cdot\cdot\cdot, v_k, v<br /> are linear independent" ??
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top