Proving Linearity of Transformation: f as a Real Number

AI Thread Summary
To prove that T is a linear transformation from P2 to F, it is essential to demonstrate that it satisfies the properties of linearity. Specifically, T must fulfill T(a + b) = T(a) + T(b) and T(ca) = cT(a) for any polynomials a, b in P2 and real number c. The discussion confirms that T(p1 + p2) = T(p1) + T(p2) and T(cp1) = cT(p1), thus showing the required properties. It is clarified that f can be treated like a real number for the purpose of this proof, but it is not a real number itself. The conclusion affirms that the provided reasoning is sufficient to establish T as a linear transformation.
bifodus
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Let f: R --> R and let T: P2 --> F, and T(p) = p(f). Prove that T is a linear transformation.

P2 is the set of polynomials of degree 2 or less, and F is the set of all functions.

It seems to me that I can treat f as really just a real number, in which case it's no different from proving T(p) = p(x) for all x in R. Is it this simple?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can treat f similarly to a real number, because you can add and multiply real-valued functions, but you can't treat it as a real number.

Secondly, you're not trying to prove T(p) = p(f): that's the definition of T. You're trying to prove that T is a linear transformation from P2 to F.

Finally, F is is not just a set, it's a vector space.
 
To prove that T(p) is a linear transformation, you must show that it has the properties of a linear transformation, that is:
(a) T(a+b)=T(a)+T(b) for a,b in P2
(b) T(ca)=cT(a) for a in P2 and c in R
 
So let p1 and p2 be elements of P2
Then T(p1 + p2) = (p1 + p2)(f) = p1(f) + p2(f) = T(p1) + T(p2)
and T(cp1) = cp1(f) = cT(p1)

Is this sufficient to show that T is a linear transformation or am I leaving something out?
 
That looks right. Good job!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top