Proving Minimization of Helmholtz Free Energy at Equilibrium

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


Show that for a reaction occurring at constant T and V, F is minimized at equilibrium.

Homework Equations


##F=U-TS##
##TdS=dU+pdV-\mu dN##

The Attempt at a Solution


##dF=dU-d(TS)=dU-TdS-SdT=dU-dU -pdV+ \mu dN -S dT=-pdV - SdT + \mu dN##. At constant T and V this reduces to ##dF = \mu dN##. But I don't know what to do from here. Also in the next problem we have to use the fact that F is minimized at equilibrium to prove a relation between the chemical potentials of certain elements involved in a chemical reaction, so I assume i can't set ##dN=0##, as in a chemical reaction N changes and it seems that the fact that F is minimal at equilibrium holds in chemical reactions, too.
How can I solve this? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When multiple species exist, the last term must be ##\Sigma\mu_i \,dN_i##, no? That's quite different from ##\mu\,dN## in the context of your problem.

Then, you have to prove that ##F## is minimized rather than maximized or at a saddle point. Use the second derivative to do this.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top