Proving Non-Continuity of a Function with Multiple Attained Values

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a function f defined on the interval [0,1] that attains each of its values exactly twice. The original poster attempts to prove that this function cannot be continuous.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various cases of how the function might attain its maximum and minimum values, questioning the implications of continuity and the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT). There are discussions about whether certain configurations lead to the function attaining a value three times.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the phrasing of the original statement and the assumptions made. Some guidance has been offered regarding the implications of the IVT, and one participant indicates they have reached an understanding.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of potential confusion regarding the original hypothesis and its implications. The discussion also touches on the nature of continuity and the behavior of the function between its extrema.

kbfrob

Homework Statement


Suppose f: [0,1] -> [0,1] is such that f attains each of its values exactly twice
Show that f cannot be continuous

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that f is continuous and tried to break it up into cases and show that there must be a value that is obtained 3 times.
since f is defined on an interval it has a sup and an inf (each attained twice by hypothesis). my cases are the order in which the are attained, i.e. 1) max,min,max,min or 2) max,max,min,min
case 1 is easy, but i can't figure out how to do case 2
is this the right approach or is there an easier way?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you phrased the question right? Your sentence ends abruptly and the hypothesis you used in the proof doesn't match the hypothesis you gave.
 
my bad. poor mistake for me to make
 
kfrob, stick to your guns and don't just admit you are wrong when you aren't. If you have either (min,max,min,max) or (max,min,max,min) if min<y<max how many times is f(x)=y if f is continuous? At least. Use the IVT. If it's (max,max) what does that mean?
 
i got that part, but i can't figure out how to show that f attains a given value 3 time if you have (max,max,min,min) or (min,min,max,max). drawing it i can see that is true, but any heuristic argument involves me saying that f has a "relative min" between the maximums and a "relative max" between the minimums. IVT is about as far as we've gotten so i can't make any argument about f'. is there a way to get around this?
 
If you have two different consecutive maxes, doesn't there have to be a min in between? Otherwise the function must be constant in between? Which means it achieves that value an infinite number of times?
 
i finally got it. thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K