Proving or Disproving Null Space Containment in F(n) for A and A^2

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
sarumman
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


given
upload_2018-12-19_23-51-14.png
I am required to proove or disprove:[/B]
lTxizl2.jpg


Homework Equations


rank
dim
null space

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to base my answer based on the fact that null A and null A^2 is Contained in F (n)
and
dim N(A)+rank(A)=N
same goes for A^2.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-12-19_23-51-14.png
    upload_2018-12-19_23-51-14.png
    952 bytes · Views: 809
  • lTxizl2.jpg
    lTxizl2.jpg
    2 KB · Views: 736
on Phys.org
Why don't you just use the definition?

##x \in Null(A) \implies Ax = 0 ##

If the statement is true, you have to prove that ##A^2 x = 0##. Can you show that?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sarumman
Math_QED said:
Why don't you just use the definition?

##x \in Null(A) \implies Ax = 0 ##

If the statement is true, you have to prove that ##A^2 x = 0##. Can you show that?
thank you! you mean like so:
upload_2018-12-20_0-5-50.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-12-20_0-5-50.png
    upload_2018-12-20_0-5-50.png
    40.2 KB · Views: 546
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
Yes, the idea is certainly correct. The proof exposition can be better though. Here is how I would write it:

We want to prove that ##Null(A) \subseteq Null(A^2)##, so let's take an arbitrary element ##x \in Null(A)##. By definition, this means that ##Ax = 0##. Since ##A^2x = (AA)x = A(Ax) = A0 = 0## (here we used associativity of matrix multiplication/function composition), it follows that ##x \in Null(A^2)##, and we are done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and WWGD