Proving Orbit Derivation in External Gravitational Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter bemigh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Orbit
bemigh
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,
I need to prove something explictly, problem is, i don't know where to start.
In orbits, we can show that the motion of 2 bodies interacting with each other only by central forces can be reduced to a an equivalent one-body problem. This is by using a Lagrangian, and by introducing an 'equivalent' mass.
The question is to show that this is possible even if these bodies are in an external uniform gravitational field.
I don't know where to start. I can't see how a gravitational field will affect the Lagrangian, because a graviatational field will just affect the potential energy term. This isn't really solving it explicity though...
any ideas where to start?
Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bemigh said:
Hey everyone,
I need to prove something explictly, problem is, i don't know where to start.
In orbits, we can show that the motion of 2 bodies interacting with each other only by central forces can be reduced to a an equivalent one-body problem. This is by using a Lagrangian, and by introducing an 'equivalent' mass.
The question is to show that this is possible even if these bodies are in an external uniform gravitational field.
I don't know where to start. I can't see how a gravitational field will affect the Lagrangian, because a graviatational field will just affect the potential energy term. This isn't really solving it explicity though...
any ideas where to start?
Cheers

If I'm following your argument correctly, you've made the correct connection. The process by which the coordinates are modified to produce an equivalent one body problem do not depend on a specific form of a potential, so the process will still go through. All you should have to do to prove the process is possible is to input the change of variables into the Lagrangian explicitly.

-Dan
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top