Proving properties of lim sup. Good attempt at proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter tamintl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Properties
tamintl
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
[/itex]

Homework Statement


Is the following statement true or false: 'if (cn) and (dn) are bounded sequences of positive real numbers then:

lim sup (cndn) = (lim sup cn)(lim sup dn)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


for all n in the positive reals. cn and dn are bounded.

Since cn and dn are bounded we know they converge.

Hence, by the theorem lim(cndn)=lim cnlim dn we can say that lim(cn)=lim sup (cn) and lim(dn)=lim sup (dn)

Hence, lim sup (cndn) = (lim sup cn)(lim sup dn)

HENCE, TRUE!

******I am not sure about line 2 where I say bounded => converge. I know that you can say that converge means bounded but I don't know if I can do the reverse.*******
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tamintl said:
******I am not sure about line 2 where I say bounded => converge. I know that you can say that converge means bounded but I don't know if I can do the reverse.*******

You can't. You can say that a bounded monotone sequence converges and that a bounded sequence has a convergent subsequence. But a bounded sequence need not converge. You should be able to come up with a pretty simple example of a bounded sequence that does not converge (at least now that you know there is one). In the process of doing so, you may stumble across the answer to your problem.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top