Proving rational surd inequalities

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,827
Reaction score
415
Homework Statement
show that ##\frac {1}{2\sqrt {n+1} }##< ##(n+1)^{0.5} -n^{0.5}##
Relevant Equations
maths induction
1599899474619.png


my attempt, i am not good in this kind of questions ...i need guidance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think using induction may be quite awkward in this case. Instead, why not rearrange the original inequality?
 
PeroK said:
I think using induction may be quite awkward in this case. Instead, why not rearrange the original inequality?

ok let me re arrange and upload...i have a problem with the latex for this problem...can you amend the original question for me?
 
1599900478273.png


sorry perok, this is how the original question looks like, a colleague suggested that i use maths induction...so what exactly am i supposed to do...thanks in advance
 
chwala said:
View attachment 269239

sorry perok, this is how the original question looks like, a colleague suggested that i use maths induction...so what exactly am i supposed to do...thanks in advance
That doesn't ask you to use induction for part a). Only part c).
 
ok let me type what i had done initially in a moment...hope you're safe during this trying times of corona virus...
 
1599902157388.png


is this right approach?
 
Showing that the inequality holds for ##n=0## is not sufficient to deduce it holds ##\forall n \geq 0##.
 
etotheipi said:
Showing that the inequality holds for ##n=0## is not sufficient to deduce it holds ##\forall n \geq 0##.

ok what approach should i take on this...see my proof above...is it correct?
 
  • #10
You can try raising both sides of the inequality to the power of ##-1##
 
  • #11
chwala said:
View attachment 269240

is this right approach?
I'm afraid I can't follow what you are trying to do here.

One approach is to assume that
$$\frac 1 {2\sqrt{n +1}} \ge \sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt n$$
And reach a contradiction, or a simple equation for ##n##. The first step must be to multiply through by ##\sqrt{n+1}##.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
ok let me try and follow what you have indicated...
 
  • #13
1599903656037.png
 
  • #14
The last two steps are simply not correct.

There are basic techniques here that you don't seem to have picked up. If you have a surd in the denominator, you try multiplying though by it; if you have one surd, you isolate it on one side of the equation; then you square the equation.

This is basic algebra.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
  • #15
1599905285838.png
 
  • #16
that is my another approach...
 
  • #17
chwala said:
that is my another approach...
You're nearly there. Just one step to go.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
  • #18
PeroK said:
You're nearly there. Just one step to go.
bingo...
 
  • #19
chwala said:
bingo...
But, look, you can cut out a lot of that unnecessary algebra. I'll do it without using contradiction:
$$\frac 1 {2\sqrt{n +1}} < \sqrt{n+1} - \sqrt n$$ $$\Leftrightarrow \ \ \frac 1 2 < n + 1 - \sqrt{n(n+1)}$$ $$\Leftrightarrow \ \ \sqrt{n(n+1)} < n + \frac 1 2$$ $$\Leftrightarrow \ \ n^2 + n < n^2 + n + \frac 1 4$$ $$\Leftrightarrow \ 0 < \frac 1 4$$
Therefore, the stated inequality is true for all ##n \ge 0##.
 
  • #20
ok...how would it look like with contradiction, ...
can we say ##n^2+n+0.25≤n^2+ n## is a contradiction, therefore the converse is true?
 
  • #21
chwala said:
ok...how would it look like with contradiction, ...
can we say ##n^2+n+0.25≤n^2+ n## is a contradiction, therefore the converse is true?
Yes, you cancel the ##n^2 + n## and leave a contradiction. If you don't use contradiction, then you need to take care that you have a two-way implication in each line.
 
  • Like
Likes chwala
  • #22
PeroK said:
Yes, you cancel the ##n^2 + n## and leave a contradiction. If you don't use contradiction, then you need to take care that you have a two-way implication in each line.

perok thanks for your time on this, i will endeavour to be more visible on this forum, cheers bingo:cool:
 
  • #23
1599949984597.png


this is how my colleague handled part a of the question
 
  • #24
1599950065412.png


this is how he did part (c) of the question, i would appreciate alternative ways...
 
Back
Top