Proving Rolle's Theorem - Finding 2 Real Roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter roam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12
Use Rolle's theorem to show that g(x) = 3x^4 +4x^3 +6x^2 -3 has exactly two real roots.



3. The Attempt at a Solution :

Rolle's theorem states that if g is continious on the closed interval [a,b] and differentiable on the open interval (a,b). Assuming that g(a) = g(b). Then g'(x0) = 0 for at least one point x0 in (a,b).

Looking at the derivative of that function:
g'(x) = 12x^3 + 12x^2 + 12x

the function is equal to zero when;
12x^3 + 12x^2 + 12x = 0
x (x^2 + x + 1) = 0

I used the quadratic formula and I believe x^2 + x + 1 has no real roots which means x = 0 is the only real root for the derivative function. Thus x = 0 is the only "stationary point" on the curve for the original function g(x).

I only found one stationary point! How does this show that "there can be at most 2 real roots"?

How can I use Rolle's theorem to prove that g has at most two real roots?

(I believe at x = 0 the function is negative and it perhaps crosses the x-axis but I don't know how to find the coordinates of the roots!)


 
Physics news on Phys.org
higher-order version?

roam said:
Use Rolle's theorem to show that g(x) = 3x^4 +4x^3 +6x^2 -3 has exactly two real roots.


Hi roam! :smile:

:confused: the only thing I can think of is that perhaps they mean the higher-order version of Rolle's theorem …

If g(a) = g(b) = g(c) with a < b < c, then there must be an x with a < x < c and g''(x) = 0.
 
roam said:
Use Rolle's theorem to show that g(x) = 3x^4 +4x^3 +6x^2 -3 has exactly two real roots.



3. The Attempt at a Solution :

Rolle's theorem states that if g is continious on the closed interval [a,b] and differentiable on the open interval (a,b). Assuming that g(a) = g(b). Then g'(x0) = 0 for at least one point x0 in (a,b).

Looking at the derivative of that function:
g&#039;(x) = 12x^3 + 12x^2 + 12x

the function is equal to zero when;
12x^3 + 12x^2 + 12x = 0
x (x^2 + x + 1) = 0

I used the quadratic formula and I believe x^2 + x + 1 has no real roots which means x = 0 is the only real root for the derivative function. Thus x = 0 is the only "stationary point" on the curve for the original function g(x).

I only found one stationary point! How does this show that "there can be at most 2 real roots"?

How can I use Rolle's theorem to prove that g has at most two real roots?

(I believe at x = 0 the function is negative and it perhaps crosses the x-axis but I don't know how to find the coordinates of the roots!)


I don't know if you have really "used" Rolles theorem but it is true that y'= 0 only at x= 0. Now, look at x= 1. y'(1)= 1(12+ 1+ 1)= 3> 0. Since y'= 0 only at 0 (and y' is continuous) that tells that y'> 0 and y is increasing for all x> 0. Look at x= -1. y'(-1)= (-1)((-1)2+ (-1)+ 1)= (-1)(1)= -1< 0. That tells you that y'< 0 and y is decreasing for all x< 0. That should be enough to tell you that y cannot have more than rwo zeros.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top