MHB Proving that a ring is non a PID

  • Thread starter Thread starter pantboio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pid Ring
pantboio
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Let $$R=\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-13}]$$, let $$p$$ be a prime in $$\mathbb{N}$$, $$p\neq 2,13$$. Suppose that $$p$$ divides an integer of the form $$a^2+13b^2$$, with $$a,b$$ integers and coprime. Let $$P=(p,a+b\sqrt{-13})$$ be the ideal generated in $$R$$ by $$p$$ and $$a+b\sqrt{-13}$$ and let $$\overline{P}=(p,a-b\sqrt{-13})$$.

1)Prove that $$P\cdot\overline{P}=pR$$

2)Prove that if $$P$$ is principal then $$p=A^2+13B^2$$ for some $$A,B$$ integers

3) Prove that if $$p=a^2+13b^2$$ then $$P$$ is principal

4) Deduce that $$\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-13}]$$ is not a PIDI have a proof of point 1). Indeed it is easily seen that $$P\cdot\overline{P}$$ can be generated by $$p^2,p(a\pm b\sqrt{-13}),a^2+13b^2$$, all elements of $$pR$$. Conversely, i proved that we may always suppose, without loss of generality, that $$p^2$$ does not divide $$a^2+13b^2$$ hence $$p=\gcd(p^2,a^2+13b^2)$$, and this last fact implies that $$p$$ can be expressed as $$\mathbb{Z}$$-linear combination of $$p^2$$ and $$a^2+13b^2$$, both elements of $$P\cdot\overline{P}$$ so that we get the inclusion $$pR\subseteq P\cdot\overline{P}$$.

For the other points, any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pantboio said:
Let $$R=\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-13}]$$, let $$p$$ be a prime in $$\mathbb{N}$$, $$p\neq 2,13$$. Suppose that $$p$$ divides an integer of the form $$a^2+13b^2$$, with $$a,b$$ integers and coprime. Let $$P=(p,a+b\sqrt{-13})$$ be the ideal generated in $$R$$ by $$p$$ and $$a+b\sqrt{-13}$$ and let $$\overline{P}=(p,a-b\sqrt{-13})$$.

1)Prove that $$P\cdot\overline{P}=pR$$

2)Prove that if $$P$$ is principal then $$p=A^2+13B^2$$ for some $$A,B$$ integers

3) Prove that if $$p=a^2+13b^2$$ then $$P$$ is principal

4) Deduce that $$\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-13}]$$ is not a PIDI have a proof of point 1). Indeed it is easily seen that $$P\cdot\overline{P}$$ can be generated by $$p^2,p(a\pm b\sqrt{-13}),a^2+13b^2$$, all elements of $$pR$$. Conversely, i proved that we may always suppose, without loss of generality, that $$p^2$$ does not divide $$a^2+13b^2$$ hence $$p=\gcd(p^2,a^2+13b^2)$$, and this last fact implies that $$p$$ can be expressed as $$\mathbb{Z}$$-linear combination of $$p^2$$ and $$a^2+13b^2$$, both elements of $$P\cdot\overline{P}$$ so that we get the inclusion $$pR\subseteq P\cdot\overline{P}$$.

For the other points, any help would be appreciated
For 2), suppose that $P$ is principal, say $P = (A+B\sqrt{-13})$, for some $A,\;B\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then $\overline{P} = (A-B\sqrt{-13})$, and $P\cdot\overline{P} = (A^2+13B^2)$. But $p\in P\cdot\overline{P}$ (by (1)), and so $p$ is a multiple of $A^2+13B^2$. Now use that fact that $p$ is prime in $\mathbb{Z}$ to deduce that $p=A^2+13B^2$.

For 3), if $p=a^2+13b^2 = (a+b\sqrt{-13})(a-b\sqrt{-13})$, then clearly $P = (a+b\sqrt{-13})$, which is principal.

For 4), you just need to find a prime $p$ in $\mathbb{Z}$ which is not of the form $a^2+13b^2$, but which has a multiple of that form (try $p=11$). Then by (1) and (2) $(p,a+b\sqrt{-13})$ is not principal.
 
Opalg said:
For 2), suppose that $P$ is principal, say $P = (A+B\sqrt{-13})$, for some $A,\;B\in\mathbb{Z}$. Then $\overline{P} = (A-B\sqrt{-13})$, and $P\cdot\overline{P} = (A^2+13B^2)$. But $p\in P\cdot\overline{P}$ (by (1)), and so $p$ is a multiple of $A^2+13B^2$. Now use that fact that $p$ is prime in $\mathbb{Z}$ to deduce that $p=A^2+13B^2$.

For 3), if $p=a^2+13b^2 = (a+b\sqrt{-13})(a-b\sqrt{-13})$, then clearly $P = (a+b\sqrt{-13})$, which is principal.

For 4), you just need to find a prime $p$ in $\mathbb{Z}$ which is not of the form $a^2+13b^2$, but which has a multiple of that form (try $p=11$). Then by (1) and (2) $(p,a+b\sqrt{-13})$ is not principal.
Almost all is clear now for me, thanks. According to your suggestion, i take the prime $$p=11$$, which is not of the form $$A^2+13\cdot B^2$$, but has a multiple, namely its square $$121$$ such that $$121=2^2+13\cdot 3^2$$ so that the ideal $$(11,2+3\sqrt{-13})$$ is not principal, thanks to 2). There are left only few questions I summarize as follows:

1) What is the role played by point 3) in all this?? I mean, I've used only 2) to state that the ideal is non-principal...?

2) Why (in the book where i found this exercise) are we prevented from taking $$p=2,13$$?
 
pantboio said:
1) What is the role played by point 3) in all this?? I mean, I've used only 2) to state that the ideal is non-principal...?
As far as I can see, (3) is not actually needed for the rest of the question. I suppose it is just there for its intrinsic interest. :confused:

pantboio said:
2) Why (in the book where i found this exercise) are we prevented from taking $$p=2,13$$?
In your proof of (1), you said "we may always suppose, without loss of generality, that $p^2$ does not divide $a^2+13b^2$".
You may find that supposition is not valid if $p=2$ or $13$.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top