Proving the Convergence of a Sequence Using Riemann Sums

  • Thread starter Thread starter chicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Sequence
chicky
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
show that 1/n+1 +1/n+2 +...1/2n≤from 2n to n∫dt/t≤1/n+...1/2n-1



consider the sequene (Vn) defined by:
Vn= 1/n+1 +...+1/2n=from 2n to p=n+1∑1/p
deduce from above that ln2-1/2n≤ Vn≤ln2




i didnt find any thing
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chicky said:
show that 1/n+1 +1/n+2 +...1/2n≤from 2n to n∫dt/t≤1/n+...1/2n-1
Are you saying "Show that
\frac{1}{n+1}+ \frac{1}{n+2}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n}\le \int_{2n}^n\int \frac{dt}{t}\le \frac{1}{n}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n-1}[/itex]<br /> <br /> Looks to me like the integral in the middle will be negative: \int_{2n}^n dt/t= ln(n)- ln(2n)= ln(n/2n)= ln(1/2)= -ln(2)= -0.693147 and that can&#039;t possibly statisfy the sums you give.<br /> <br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> <b>consider the sequene (Vn) defined by: <br /> Vn= 1/n+1 +...+1/2n=from 2n to p=n+1∑1/p<br /> deduce from above that ln2-1/2n≤ Vn≤ln2<br /> </b><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <b>i didnt find any thing</b> </div> </div> </blockquote>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
\frac{1}{n+1}+ \frac{1}{n+2}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n}\le \int_{2n}^n\frac{dt}{t}\le \frac{1}{n}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n-1}
its like this
not two integrals its one integral
 
Chicky, by what you want to deduce it looks like you have your bounds of integration backwards
 
\frac{1}{n+1}+ \frac{1}{n+2}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n}\le \int_{2n}^n\frac{dt}{t}\le \frac{1}{n}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{2n-1}
we must show this not deduce it
 
Your inequalities aren't true, so you can't "show" this. What Kreizhn is trying to say that you may have your limits of integration in the wrong order (by switching them, the inequalities are then true). Anyway, here's what you should try: consider approximating the area underneath 1/t using n rectangles of width 1 (i.e. all rectangles have their upper right corners on 1/t). Then try approximating the integral by overestimating -- use n rectangles of width 1 but with their upper left corners on 1/t. If you graph 1/t and draw out the rectangles and compute their area, it will be fairly obvious how the inequalities work.
 
am sorry the limit are in the wrong order but the inequality is true am sure
 
Let me clarify. What I meant was: with the incorrect order (limits of integration) the inequalities would (obviously) not be true.

Did you try my hint? This is just an exercise in Riemann sums.
 
i just don't know it
thanks any ways
 
  • #10
You don't know what a Riemann sum is? Or do you mean you just don't want to try what has been suggested?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top