Proving the Existence of Even and Odd Functions in f:R-->R

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that any function f: R → R can be expressed as the sum of an even function p and an odd function i. Participants suggest examining the relationship between f(-x) and the proposed functions p(x) and i(x). It is noted that if the theorem holds, then f(-x) can be represented as p(x) - i(x). The conversation highlights a breakthrough in understanding the relationship between even and odd functions. Ultimately, the participants acknowledge the insight gained from this exploration.
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I'm puzzled by this question: Show that for all function f:R-->R. there exists an even function p and an odd function i such that f(x) = p(x) + i(x) forall x in R.

I got nothing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try looking at f(-x) and relating it to p(x) and i(x). Do you notice anything?
 
But there is nothing to look at. f(-x) = ......?

The only thing would be SUPPOSING the result of the thorem is true, then it would implies that there exist p and i such that f(x) = p+i and hence f(-x) = p(x)-i(x), but that's as far as that goes.
 
f(x) = p+i and hence f(-x) = p(x)-i(x), but that's as far as that goes.

No it's not.
 
Oh I see. That was very insightful Hurkyl. :-p
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Focussing a collimated beam using a diffraction grating
Replies
1
Views
656
Uncertainties For Wave Packets
Replies
4
Views
895
If ##V(x)## is an even function then the energy eigenfunc....
Replies
5
Views
1K
MIT OCW, 8.02 Electromagnetism: Potential for an Electric Dipole
Replies
1
Views
2K
How to prove that a force is conservative?
Replies
40
Views
5K
Deriving Cross Vectors: Understanding d/dt[a * (v x r)] = a (v x r)
Replies
16
Views
3K
Fourier series, periodic function for a string free at each end
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Meaning of ##\coprod_{x\in\mathrm{Spec}R}R/\mathfrak{p}_x##
Replies
11
Views
747
I Determination of error in interpolating polynomial
Replies
5
Views
2K
Why the existence of the potential function ##U## is not sufficient?
Replies
1
Views
911

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top