Proving the Existence of Frontier Points for Sets in ℝ

  • Thread starter Thread starter ppy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points Proof
ppy
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
3.4. Let E\in  R. Prove or disprove the following statements:
(i) if a\inE and b\inE^{c} = ℝ\E and a < b then [a ,b] \cap∂E IS NOT EQUAL TO ∅.
(ii) if a\inE and b\inE^{c} = ℝ\E and a < b then (a ,b) \cap∂E IS NOT EQUAL TO ∅.


I am really stuck I know that the frontier of a set is when a sequence in E and a sequence in E^{c} converge to the same limit.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am able to show this from drawing a sketch but how can I do it without a drawing?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top