Proving the Limit of (x^2-1)=3 using Epsilon-Delta Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter 0range
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exercise Limit
AI Thread Summary
To prove that lim (x^2-1) = 3 as x approaches -2 using the epsilon-delta definition, it is necessary to establish a relationship between E (epsilon) and D (delta). The goal is to find D such that if |x + 2| < D, then |(x^2 - 4)| < E. The discussion highlights that if |x + 2| < 1, then |x - 2| can be bounded, leading to the conclusion that |(x + 2)(x - 2)| can be controlled. The key insight is that taking D = min{E/5, 1} ensures the limit condition is satisfied. This approach clarifies how to manipulate the inequalities to achieve the desired limit proof.
0range
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove each statement using the epsilon delta definition of limit.

lim (x^2-1)=3
x -> -2



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Given E > 0, we need D > 0 such that if |x-(-2)|&lt;D then |(x^2-4|&lt;E.

If |x+2|&lt;1, then -1&lt;x+2&lt;1 -5&lt;x-2&lt;-3 |x-2|&lt;5.

Here's where I'm lost... my answer key says to take D=min{E/5,1} but I don't understand why this is.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0range said:

Homework Statement



Prove each statement using the epsilon delta definition of limit.

lim (x^2-1)=3
x -> -2



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Given E > 0, we need D > 0 such that if |x-(-2)|&lt;D then |(x^2-4|&lt;E.

If |x+2|&lt;1, then -1&lt;x+2&lt;1 -5&lt;x-2&lt;-3 |x-2|&lt;5.

Here's where I'm lost... my answer key says to take D=min{E/5,1} but I don't understand why this is.

Thanks in advance.

So if |x+2| < 1 what would be your overestimate for

|x2 - 4| = |(x+2)(x-2)| ?

This is what you are trying to make small. How close to -2 does x have to be?
 
Sorry... I don't know how to figure that out.
 
You want to make |(x+2)(x- 2)|&lt; \epsilon. That's the same as |x+ 2|&lt; \epsilon/|x- 2|

Now, you have calculated that -5< x- 2< -3 so that 3<|x- 2< 5. The one you really want is 3< |x- 2|. That way, 1/|x- 2|> 1/3 and so \epsilon/|x-2|&gt; \epsilon/3.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LCKurtz said:
So if |x+2| < 1 what would be your overestimate for

|x2 - 4| = |(x+2)(x-2)| ?

This is what you are trying to make small. How close to -2 does x have to be?

0range said:
Sorry... I don't know how to figure that out.

If |x+2| < 1 you have shown that |(x-2)| < 5. So

|x2 - 4| = |(x+2)(x-2)| < 5|(x+2)|

How small does |x+2| need to be to make this less than \epsilon? Answer that and you will see where the book's answer comes from.
 
I think I get it now... when I'm home from work I'll sit down, work through it and post the answer.

Thanks again, your help is very appreciated guys.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top