Proving Thomae's Function f(x) Not Differentiable"

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that Thomae's function, defined as f(x) = p/q for rational x (where p and q are relatively prime) and f(x) = 0 for irrational x, is not differentiable. Participants clarify the definition of the function, suggesting it may be a modified Dirichlet function, which is continuous at irrational points but discontinuous at rational points. The key point is that since a function cannot be differentiable where it is not continuous, Thomae's function cannot be differentiable at any rational number. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear understanding of the function's behavior around rational and irrational numbers to establish non-differentiability. Overall, the function's continuity at irrationals does not imply differentiability, highlighting its unique properties.
limdaesung
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thomae function f(x):(0,1)->R f(x)=p/q x is rational number (p and q are relatively prime natural number) f(x)=0 x in irrational number show that f is not differrentiable. l can show that this function is not differentiable at rational number. But i can't sequence that is example. not differrentiable at irrational number. how take this sequence.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
please i want to find this sequence quickly.
 
A good start would be rereading the problem and then writing it down correctly! What you have written makes no sense.
Thomae function f(x):(0,1)->R f(x)=p/q x is rational number (p and q are relatively prime natural number) f(x)=0 x in irrational number

I presume that means that if is an irrational number then f(x)= 0, but it's not clear to me what f(x) is if x is rational. You say f(x)= p/q but you haven't told us what numbers p and q are.

I might be inclined to guess that you mean "if x is a rational number, x= p/q with p and q relatively prime, the f(x)= 1/q." That's a fairly well known function, often called the "modified Dirichlet function". (The regular Dirichlet function is f(x)= 0 if x is irrational, f(x)= 1 if x is rational.)

If that is the function you are talking about, it can be shown that lim(x->a) f(x)= 0 for all a so the modified Dirichlet function is continuous for all irrational a, discontinuous for rational a. Since a function cannot be differentiable where it is not continuous, if this is the right function, then I presume the problem is to show that this function, even though it is continuous at each irrational number, is not differentiable there.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top