Psychopathic Bosses: Is This the Way to Get Ahead in Industry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kenneth Mann
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of psychopathy in leadership within the industry, sparked by an article from Fast Company Magazine. Participants debate whether ruthless, self-serving leaders are necessary for driving productivity and success. One viewpoint suggests that strong, psychopathic traits can motivate others to work harder, while another clarifies that true psychopaths, unlike merely tough leaders, are primarily self-interested and can harm organizations for personal gain. The conversation highlights the dangers of allowing such individuals to rise to power, drawing parallels to notorious figures like Bernard Ebbers and Andrew Fastow, and raises ethical concerns about the lack of mechanisms to prevent harmful executives from attaining leadership roles.
Kenneth Mann
Messages
424
Reaction score
3
Is this the way to get ahead in industry?

Fast Company Magazine

KM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OF COURSE they're bloody psychopaths!
Otherwise, they wouldn't have been able to get us slouchers off our behinds and actually deserve a salary.
 
We NEED psychopaths of that kind to lead us. Sometimes people need to be ruthless and we need leaders. (well... You do :P)
 
arildno said:
OF COURSE they're bloody psychopaths!
Otherwise, they wouldn't have been able to get us slouchers off our behinds and actually deserve a salary.

Nerro said:
We NEED psychopaths of that kind to lead us. Sometimes people need to be ruthless and we need leaders. (well... You do :P)

It appears that you guys didn't read the article. By Psychopath, it is not referring to hard-driving, no-nonsense types with big egos, but with real psychos. Those people don't care one whit about the company, but rather with themselves only. They'll drive a company to ruin to enrich themselves. In fact, they usually get a thrill from the challenge of their actions. The article compares these with serial killers in many ways, for example, they are great con-men. The have the knack of being able to talk and charm their way into peoples confidence; to get peoples trust, while having none in return (like J. Dahmer). Is that what you advocate? Examples given were Bernard Ebbers (Worldcom) and Andrew Fastow (Enron). What the article brought to my mind was Hitler.

KM
 
Jeffrey Dahmer was a sociopath, rather than a psychopath. He was not particularly charming in his outward demeanor, and quite uncharming in his private life.


And yes, I do get your point. Since any sort of societal mechanism of weeding out unpalatable executives is regarded by a wide majority as morally unjustifiable to put into action, these disgusting individuals will still get the positions they want in order to pester and harass the lives of decent folk.
 
Last edited:
https://www.newsweek.com/robert-redford-dead-hollywood-live-updates-2130559 Apparently Redford was a somewhat poor student, so was headed to Europe to study art and painting, but stopped in New York and studied acting. Notable movies include Barefoot in the Park (1967 with Jane Fonda), Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969, with Paul Newma), Jeremiah Johnson, the political drama The Candidate (both 1972), The Sting (1973 with Paul Newman), the romantic dramas The Way We Were (1973), and...
Back
Top