Pulleys and Mass becoming infinitely large

  • Thread starter Thread starter puma7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 100kg man and a 50kg mass connected by a pulley. The first part of the problem, which was solved, calculated the tension in the rope. The second part raises the question of the man's acceleration as the mass becomes infinitely large, with initial thoughts suggesting infinite acceleration. However, it is clarified that regardless of the mass's increase, the man's acceleration cannot exceed gravitational acceleration (g), leading to the conclusion that it approaches g as the mass approaches infinity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of analyzing the problem from different perspectives to understand the underlying physics better.
puma7
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is 2 problems that continue one another; I solved the first one but do not understand the second.

Homework Statement


A 100kg man dangles a 50kg mass from the end of a rope. If he stands on a frictionless surface and hangs the mass over a cliff with a pulley, the tension in the rope will be: (Note: Ignore any frictional forces) [SOLVED]

In the question above, as the mass becomes infinitely large, the man's acceleration becomes:
A. 5m/s2
B. 10m/s2
C. 20m/s2
D. infinite

Homework Equations


F = ma


The Attempt at a Solution


The solution to the first problem:
50g = (50+100)a
a = g/3 ~ 3.33
T = mass of man (a) = 100(3.33) = 333N

For the second problem:
Now the acceleration is directly tied to the mass of the block, so when it becomes infinite, I think the acceleration should be infinite.

However, in the answers it says: "B is correct. No matter how large the mass gets, its acceleration can never be greater than g, because it is gravity that is acting on it. Of course, the man will not be accelerated faster than the mass."

They go on to repeat this method again in the next problem. I don't really understand how the man's acceleration would still be finite with a block of infinite mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
puma7 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution to the first problem:
50g = (50+100)a
a = g/3 ~ 3.33
Good.
T = mass of man (a) = 100(3.33) = 333N
Not good. Redo this.

For the second problem:
Now the acceleration is directly tied to the mass of the block, so when it becomes infinite, I think the acceleration should be infinite.

However, in the answers it says: "B is correct. No matter how large the mass gets, its acceleration can never be greater than g, because it is gravity that is acting on it. Of course, the man will not be accelerated faster than the mass."

They go on to repeat this method again in the next problem. I don't really understand how the man's acceleration would still be finite with a block of infinite mass.
Forget the rope and the 50 kg mass for a second. If the man just dropped, what would be his acceleration? If his mass doubled, what would change? What if he were 1000 kg, not 100 kg?

Instead of trying to do it 'in your head', just redo your first calculation with increasing mass and see what happens. Make his mass first 100 kg, then 1000 kg, then 10000 kg. See the pattern.
 
If the man just dropped, then mg = ma and a = g. I see how acceleration will approach g as the mass goes to infinity now.

Doc Al said:
Not good. Redo this.

What do you mean redo this? If you do it from the perspective of the block, then
mg - T = ma
T = mg - ma = 50(10 - 3.33) = 333N
 
puma7 said:
If the man just dropped, then mg = ma and a = g. I see how acceleration will approach g as the mass goes to infinity now.
Cool.
What do you mean redo this? If you do it from the perspective of the block, then
mg - T = ma
As applied to the block, that equation has a sign error. The tension and acceleration are both upward.
 
Mg-T=Ma
T=ma

a=(\frac {M}{M+m}) g

M>>m, M+m≈M
 
azizlwl said:
Mg-T=Ma
T=ma

a=(\frac {M}{M+m}) g

M>>m, M+m≈M
Your second and third equations are incorrect.

But I agree that the best way to see the answer is to solve it symbolically and let M → ∞.
Why not let the OP solve it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top