Pulse Through Cable: Solving Part A and B

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmmboh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cable Pulse
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about solving parts A and B of a pulse through a cable problem, the participant initially calculated the wave speed and time for part A correctly but expressed confusion regarding the voltage calculations in part B. They used the wrong equation for reflection coefficients and were unsure about the impact of the load resistance on the pulse height. Clarifications indicated that the correct approach involves considering the open circuit at the oscilloscope and the effect of the characteristic impedance. Ultimately, the consensus is that the pulse height at the oscilloscope could be 24V, factoring in reflections and the correct voltage division. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately applying the equations related to wave propagation and reflection in transmission lines.
mmmboh
Messages
401
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is the question:

66ltgp.jpg


For part a) I did V=(L/C)-1/2=2.5x108 m/s. And then I said T=x/v where x=10m, so T=4x10-8s.

For part b) V++V-=VL...since it's the first wave I suppose there wouldn't be a reflecting wave yet, so V-=0.
I have an equation that says V+=[VL/2](1+R0/RL)...since it is an open circuit, RL=infinity, so R0/RL=0, and the equation becomes V+=VL/2 and VL=12V, so V+=pulse height = 6V...but if V_-=0 then according to my first equation V_+=V_L=12V..I'm confused.

I have a feeling b) is wrong and that it should actually be 24V because of a combination of waves, I'm not sure about part a), any help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mmmboh said:
Hi, this is the question:

66ltgp.jpg


For part a) I did V=(L/C)-1/2=2.5x108 m/s. And then I said T=x/v where x=10m, so T=4x10-8s.

For part b) V++V-=VL...since it's the first wave I suppose there wouldn't be a reflecting wave yet, so V-=0.
I have an equation that says V+=[VL/2](1+R0/RL)...since it is an open circuit, RL=infinity, so R0/RL=0, and the equation becomes V+=VL/2 and VL=12V, so V+=pulse height = 6V...but if V_-=0 then according to my first equation V_+=V_L=12V..I'm confused.

I have a feeling b) is wrong and that it should actually be 24V because of a combination of waves, I'm not sure about part a), any help please?

It looks like you used the equation for characteristic impedance:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Characteristic_impedance

instead of for the propagation velocity (of a lossless TL):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_propagation_speed

And to your question about the amplitude at the first reflection, remember that you are driving the TL through the 200 Ohm resistor. That will play off against the Zo of the TL. And I believe they want you to include the reflection effects in calculating the initial open circuit voltage at the open end...
 
For the propagation velocity thing, is that for part a)? I used the same equation except without the c in the denominator because I don't need what fraction of the speed of light it is.

For part b), I'm not sure I understand what to do in that case, is the equation I used wrong?
 
mmmboh said:
For the propagation velocity thing, is that for part a)? I used the same equation except without the c in the denominator because I don't need what fraction of the speed of light it is.

You posted for part a:

For part a) I did V=(L/C)-1/2

That's Zo.
 
Ooh right, I meant to put v=(LC)^-1/2 actually, that's the calculation I did, so the answer remains the same for part a).
 
Ok so from my equation for reflection coefficient, V-/V+(=RL-R0)/(RL+R0)...since there is an open circuit at the oscilloscope RL=infinity, and so V-/V+=1...so V- and V+ add together to make the pulse height at the oscilloscope 24 V...the answer is either that, or since Z0=100 ohm and the resistance in the generator is 200 ohm then V+=12V(100/300)=4V, unless it's 12V(200/300)=8V and then the V+ and V- still add and make 8V (or 16V depending on which equation is right) at the oscilloscope...

I think one of these two is the answer, maybe not, can you clear things up please?
 
mmmboh said:
Ok so from my equation for reflection coefficient, V-/V+(=RL-R0)/(RL+R0)...since there is an open circuit at the oscilloscope RL=infinity, and so V-/V+=1...so V- and V+ add together to make the pulse height at the oscilloscope 24 V...the answer is either that, or since Z0=100 ohm and the resistance in the generator is 200 ohm then V+=12V(100/300)=4V, unless it's 12V(200/300)=8V and then the V+ and V- still add and make 8V (or 16V depending on which equation is right) at the oscilloscope...

I think one of these two is the answer, maybe not, can you clear things up please?

I believe your 2nd answer is correct. As long as the TL is electrically long enough so that you can't treat it as just a lumped capacitance, then you will get the 3:1 voltage division, and the full positive reflection at the open end should give you double the incident amplitude. At least until things start ringing all over the place from the multiple reflections.
 
Ok thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top