Pushing a 94kg Crate: Calculating Force, Work & Power

  • Thread starter Thread starter chawki
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine the force needed to push a 94-kg crate, the frictional force was calculated to be 230.3 N using the coefficient of kinetic friction. The work done in moving the crate over 5.2 m was computed as 1197.56 J. Power involved in the movement was found to be 92.12 Watts, derived from the work and the time taken to move the crate. An alternative method to calculate power directly using the formula power = force times speed was suggested, which simplifies the process. This discussion illustrates the application of Newton's second law and the relationships between force, work, and power in physics.
chawki
Messages
504
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A heavy, 94-kg crate is pushed a distance of 5.2 m at a speed of 0.40 m/s on the floor of a
warehouse. The coefficient of the kinetic friction is 0.25.

Homework Equations


a) Determine the magnitude of the horizontal force needed to move the crate.
b) Find out the work done in moving the crate.
c) What is the power involved in moving the crate?

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
Ff=0.25*94*9.8
Ff=230.3 N
or should we use the second law of Newton..but then we don't have acceleration :bugeye:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi chawki! :smile:
chawki said:
A heavy, 94-kg crate is pushed a distance of 5.2 m at a speed of 0.40 m/s

or should we use the second law of Newton..but then we don't have acceleration :bugeye:

yes we do …

it's zero! :biggrin:
 
okok i always get a smile when i see the yellow fish replying :smile:

so, by applying Newton second law and by projection on xx axis, we get:
F-Ff=m*0
F=Ff
F=0.25*94*9.8
F=230.3 N

b) the work done:
W=F*d
W=230.3*5.2
W=1197.56 J

c) Power involved in moving the crate:
P=W/t
we don't have t, but we can get it
S=d/t --->t=d/S =5.2/0.4
t=13s

P=W/t
P=1197.56/13
P=92.12 Watt
 
yup! :biggrin:

except slightly quicker would have been to use power = force.speed :wink:
 
yes you are right...
 
tiny-tim said:
yup! :biggrin:

except slightly quicker would have been to use power = force.speed :wink:

That's a very good point, it will avoid calculating W if they didn't ask for the work
 
tiny-tim said:
yup! :biggrin:

except slightly quicker would have been to use power = force.speed :wink:

That's a very good point, it will avoid calculation W and t, if they don't ask for the work
 
Back
Top