Pushing Crate up Frictionless Slope Find Work

AI Thread Summary
A man pushes a 75 N crate up a frictionless slope at a 30° angle, causing it to accelerate at 0.5 m/s². To find the work done by the man over a distance of 1.5 m, the net force must be calculated, factoring in gravitational components. The weight of the crate is resolved into components: the force down the slope is 37.5 N, while the normal force is 64.951 N. The net force required for the upward acceleration is 3.826 N, which contributes to the total work done. The final calculation reveals that the work done by the man is +62 J.
Spartan Erik
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A man pushes a create which weighs 75 N upward along a frictionless slope that makes an angle of 30° with the horizontal. The force he exerts is parallel to the slope. If the speed of the crate increases at a rate of 0.5m/s^2, then the work done by the man while moving the crate a distance of 1.5m is:

-62J, +62J, -41J, +41J, none of the above

Homework Equations



W = Fdcos(theta)
W(done by gravity)= mgdcos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure exactly how to approach this problem as they supply an increasing acceleration of 0.5m/s^2. Otherwise I would just apply W = Fdcos(theta). I also know that gravity has an effect on this, but I'm not sure how to include it in this situation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a free body diagram and resolve the weight of the box into components.

Weight pointing down the plane = mg sin theta
Weight normal to the plane (the normal force) = mg cos theta.

If the object is accelerating upward at .5m/s^2, what does that tell you about the net force on the object?
 
Well the 75N is due to gravity, so the mass is 7.653kg

Breaking it into horizontal and vertical components:
mgsin(theta) = 7.653x9.8xsin(30) = 37.5
mgcos(theta) = 7.653x9.8xcos(30) = 64.951

If the object is accelerating upward at 0.5 m/s^2 and the mass is 7.653kg, then the force is 3.826N
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top