Q about diff. between ferro and paramagnetism under a strong mag field

AI Thread Summary
Ferromagnetic materials contain domains with magnetic dipoles that can align under an external magnetic field, leading to enhanced magnetization. In contrast, paramagnetic materials lack these domains, and their dipole moments align with the field but do not form stable structures. The presence of domains in ferromagnetic materials can complicate magnetization, as they can hinder alignment unless properly managed. Under strong magnetic fields, ferromagnetic materials achieve saturation magnetization more effectively than paramagnetic materials due to their inherent domain structure. Understanding the role of exchange interactions is crucial in differentiating between the two types of magnetism.
parsa418
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi
From what I understand ferromagnetic materials have domains that contain magnetic dipoles that are almost all parallel to each other. However these domains have random directions.
Under a magnetic field the domains in the ferromagnetic material that are magnetized in the field direction grow and the domains that aren't shrink.
However, in a paramagnetic material there are no domains. Under a magnetic field a lot of the dipole moments of a paramagnetic material become parallel with the field.
My first question is what makes having domains in a material better for magnetization?
My second question is under a strong magnetic field shouldn't both paramagnetic materials and ferromagnetic materials become equally magnetized because eventually all the dipole moments of both materials become parallel with the magnetic field? (is saturation magnetization related to this?)
Any help will be much appreciated
Thank you
Parsa
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Parsa! :smile:
parsa418 said:
My second question is under a strong magnetic field shouldn't both paramagnetic materials and ferromagnetic materials become equally magnetized because eventually all the dipole moments of both materials become parallel with the magnetic field? (is saturation magnetization related to this?)

I think it's only a question of degree …

both para and ferro depend on the exchange interaction (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchange_interaction), and if it's strong enough you get ferro, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramagnetism#Relation_to_electron_spins
"If there is sufficient energy exchange between neighbouring dipoles they will interact, and may spontaneously align or anti-align and form magnetic domains, resulting in ferromagnetism (permanent magnets) or antiferromagnetism, respectively."​
My first question is what makes having domains in a material better for magnetization?

No, domains make it worse

to produce a strong ferromagnet, we need to eliminate the domains! :wink:
 
Thank you tiny-tim. Sorry for the late reply. I was travelling.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top