Q: Can Matter Be Converted to Energy with 100% Efficiency?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of converting matter to energy with near 100% efficiency using lasers. It is clarified that while laser fusion can convert some mass into energy, it does not achieve the claimed efficiency and is limited to fusing light nuclei. The conservation of baryon and lepton numbers suggests that achieving complete conversion without antimatter is likely impossible. Potential interactions that could violate these conservation laws have not been confirmed, and the required conditions for such processes would necessitate extremely high-energy lasers, which do not currently exist. Overall, the consensus is that the idea of 100% efficiency in matter-energy conversion remains unfeasible with current scientific understanding.
jonnyk
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Somewhere I've heard of a special type of laser which when it strikes matter could convert near 100% of it into energy, the laser's energy being insigificantly small as compared to the output thus achieving ~100% efficiency? Is this a way or is there any other means to achieve this without having to use anti matter? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What you've heard doesn't sound right. Could you give a specific reference?

The only serious use of a laser for mass to energy conversion is laser fusion, but that fuses light nuclides into slightly heavier nuclides, where the mass difference is converted to energy.
 


Converting 100% of matter into energy, without the use of antimatter, would likely be impossible due to conservation of baryon number and lepton number. The only way it could be possible would be if there were interactions that could violate conservation of B and L; none have been discovered yet. It's possible that they could exist (the X and Y bosons, if they exist, may violate B and L conservation), but it doesn't seem likely that they could be stimulated with a laser, unless the laser was at EXTREMELY high energies, corresponding to the X and Y boson masses, which would probably be near the TeV scale. No such laser has been developed yet, and it may be impossible to build such a laser.

Fusing light nuclei into heavy nuclei, as mathman said, would convert a small portion of the mass into energy, but it would be nowhere close to 100%.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top