QED Feynman (coupling number called j)

  • Thread starter Thread starter eb227
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Feynman Qed
eb227
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
On page 92 (Figure 58) Feynman states:
"The amplitude for a coupling is a number that I will call j; it is about
negative .1 for the electron (this number is sometimes called the "charge").
Charge?? I don't get it.
Would appreciate an explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eb227 said:
On page 92 (Figure 58) Feynman states:
"The amplitude for a coupling is a number that I will call j; it is about
negative .1 for the electron (this number is sometimes called the "charge").
Charge?? I don't get it.
Would appreciate an explanation?
In what is called "natural units" in QED, the charge on the electron is given by e^2=1/137, so e would be about .1.
If you want to put in units, you would have e^2/(hbar c)=1/137.
You could even put in 1/fourpiepsilonzero if you want.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
134
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top