QED Vertex: Examining the Unexplainable G-Factor

  • Thread starter Thread starter RedX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qed
RedX
Messages
963
Reaction score
3
The QED vertex has two electrons lines joining with a photon line. However, 4-momentum conservation does not allow this process to occur. So why is this process studied?

Does it really mean anything to calculate the g-factor of an electron for a process that cannot happen? Only the vertex correction contributes to the g-factor right? But if the other end of the photon line has to connect to something else to conserve 4-momentum, then don't you have to have a diagram with the photon self-energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You misunderstand what a Feynman diagram is. It's not a description of the sequence of events (this electron is over here, then it emits a photon and moves over here...). It's a mnemonic for writing down the proper terms in doing a field theoretical calculation.
 
Would it make sense to do a field theoretical calculation for the process of incoming electron, outgoing photon, and outgoing electron? The process can't happen because 4-momentum conservation won't allow it.

I understand that such a calculation is useful if at least one of the three participating particles is off-shell, because then that would be a calculation of the basic QED vertex, which can be used to construct processes (such as 2-electron scattering) that actually can happen by 4-momentum conservation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top