How Did Quantum Field Theory and Renormalization Address Infinities in Physics?

crisis
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm an amateur with some knowledge on the surface and actually am trying to make sense of the history of QM evolution and try to put things in place by trying to understand their 'raison d'être, at the time.
So I'm back in:
1. 1926-28 with the question: how the introduction of Quantum Field solve the problem of QM and relativity with regard to simultaneously.

2. and 20 years later, at Shelter Island, with renormalization-I cannot understand it...how come does the 'forced' introduction of mass and charge resolve the problem of infinity in a satisfying manner?

Any input, links, advise will be highly appreciated,

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
crisis said:
with renormalization-I cannot understand it...how come does the 'forced' introduction of mass and charge resolve the problem of infinity in a satisfying manner?

See Chapter B5 ''Divergences and renormalization'' of my theoretical physics FAQ at http://arnold-neumaier.at/physfaq/physics-faq.html#B5
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
57
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
47
Views
16K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top