How can one obtain conserved charges from a symmetry transformation in QFT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter center o bass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Qft
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


From the Lagrangian density

L = \frac{1}2 \partial_\mu \phi_a \partial^\mu \phi_a - \frac{1}2 \phi_a \phi_a,

where a = 1,2,3 and the transformation

\phi_a \to \phi _a + \theta \epsilon_{abc} n_b \phi_c

show that one gets the conserved charges

Q_a = \int d^3x \epsilon_{abc}\dot{\phi}_b \phi_c.

Homework Equations


The transformation is a symmetry of the Lagrangian so by Noethers theorem
we got a conserved current which is given by

j^\mu = \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi_a)} \delta \phi_a = \partial^\mu \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} n_b \phi_c

The Attempt at a Solution


The obvious conserved charge is just

Q = \int d^3x j^0 = \int d^3 x \dot \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} nb \phi_c
but this is not the 3 different charges in the expression for Q_a. There is no normal vector n in that expresion and the time differentiated field has got b-index instead of an a index.
How can one get from the conserved current to the expression for these charges?
[
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expression for the conserved current doesn't look correct. In the middle term, you sum over a, but in the expression on the right, a is a free index.
 
vela said:
Your expression for the conserved current doesn't look correct. In the middle term, you sum over a, but in the expression on the right, a is a free index.

I agree and I have corrected it now. That was just a typo. Do you have any suggestion on how to go from the corrected expression to the conserved charge?
 
center o bass said:
Q_a = \int d^3x \epsilon_{abc}\dot{\phi}_a \phi_c.

Is there a typo here for the subscript on the left side?
The obvious conserved charge is just

Q = \int d^3x j^0 = \int d^3 x \dot \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} nb \phi_c
but this is not the 3 different charges in the expression for Q_a.

Is the Lagrangian invariant under the transformation for any choice of the vector nb? If so, you should be able to get three independent conserved charges by choosing three independent vectors for n. For example, what would the conserved charge be if you choose n1 = 1 and n2 = n3 = 0?
 
TSny said:
Is there a typo here for the subscript on the left side?Is the Lagrangian invariant under the transformation for any choice of the vector nb? If so, you should be able to get three independent conserved charges by choosing three independent vectors for n. For example, what would the conserved charge be if you choose n1 = 1 and n2 = n3 = 0?

Yes there was yet another typo. I have corrected that one too now. That's true.
Hmm.. The conserved current satisfy

\partial_\mu (\partial^\mu \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} n_b \phi_c) = 0

I agree with you that one should be able to get 3 independent conserved charges (and also currents), so what if i chose all components to be zero except the a'th component?
I.e. choose

n_b = \delta _{ba}.

Would it then be correct of me to write

\partial_\mu (\partial^\mu \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} \delta_{ab} \phi_c) =\partial_\mu ( \epsilon_{abc} \partial^\mu \phi_b \phi_c)= 0

so that i get

(j^\mu)_a = \epsilon_{abc} \partial^\mu \phi_b \phi_c?
 
center o bass said:
Yes there was yet another typo. I have corrected that one too now. That's true.
Hmm.. The conserved current satisfy

\partial_\mu (\partial^\mu \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} n_b \phi_c) = 0

I agree with you that one should be able to get 3 independent conserved charges (and also currents), so what if i chose all components to be zero except the a'th component?
I.e. choose

n_b = \delta _{ba}.

You don't want to use a subscript "a" here, since you are already using that symbol as a dummy summation index in jμ.

Would it then be correct of me to write

\partial_\mu (\partial^\mu \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} \delta_{ab} \phi_c) =\partial_\mu ( \epsilon_{abc} \partial^\mu \phi_b \phi_c)= 0

See, the subscript "a" is occurring three times here on the left. That's not good.

You might try again by letting n_b = \delta _{bd}. so that you're letting nd be the nonzero component of n.

You can actually go to your result for Q in your original post: Q = \int d^3x j^0 = \int d^3 x \dot \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} nb \phi_c and make this substitution rather than starting way back at the expression for jμ.
 
Last edited:
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
It's given a gas of particles all identical which has T fixed and spin S. Let's ##g(\epsilon)## the density of orbital states and ##g(\epsilon) = g_0## for ##\forall \epsilon \in [\epsilon_0, \epsilon_1]##, zero otherwise. How to compute the number of accessible quantum states of one particle? This is my attempt, and I suspect that is not good. Let S=0 and then bosons in a system. Simply, if we have the density of orbitals we have to integrate ##g(\epsilon)## and we have...
Back
Top