QM decomposing linear polarization states

doublemint
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to decompose |(pi/2)+\vartheta> into canonical basis. I have done it for |\vartheta> but i am unsure about what to do with the pi/2.

Given |theta> = (cos\vartheta sin\vartheta)
I was thinking that pi/2 becomes (0 i) and I would add the two vectors together.

Any help would be appreciated!
Thank You
DoubleMint
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe I found my answer.
Since |theta> = (cos sin), then |pi/2+theta> = (-sin cos)
 
If

| \theta \rangle = \begin{pmatrix} \cos\theta \\ \sin\theta \end{pmatrix},

then it seems natural that

| \theta + \phi \rangle = \begin{pmatrix} \cos(\theta+\phi) \\ \sin(\theta+\phi) \end{pmatrix}.

Also, note that adding quantum states means something completely different from writing down a state whose parameters are the sum of two numbers. The first is a superposition of two states, each with definite quantum numbers.
 
doublemint,

how did u get the one for theta ?

I am going over his class examples and can't seem to get it..

thanks in advance
 
i think i got it ... it was right there and i was over complicating things... thank you anyways! :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top