[QM] Help understanding this bra-ket solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter JBrandonS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bra-ket Qm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of an operator A and its eigenkets a' and a''. The user initially struggles with a specific expression involving the inner product and the properties of hermitian operators. They realize that multiplying by the identity operator helps clarify the relationship between the terms, leading to the correct interpretation of the equation. Ultimately, the user concludes that they have solved their confusion but expresses uncertainty about the overall implications of the notation. The thread highlights the challenges of mastering quantum mechanics concepts and the importance of seeking clarification in advanced topics.
JBrandonS
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am working my way though Sakurai's book on Quantum MEchanics and am having some problems understanding the bra-ket notation. I keep believing I understand everything there is to it but then he will do something in a single line that I cannot understand. This is one of them. If someone could help me out it would be great.

Homework Statement



Show why the following in correct: <a''|A|a'>=<a'|A|a'>\delta_{a'a''}= a'\delta_{a'a''}

A is an hermitian operator. a' and a'' are the eigenkets and eigenvalues of A.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The only method I can think of to coming up with the final solution is the following, which may not even be correct.

Use A|a'> = a'|a'> since A is hermitian and rewrite as <a''|a'|a'>
Since a' is real a'=a'^* so we can rewrite as a'<a''|a'>
From here we can use the fact that a'' and a' are orthonormal eigenkets from the same operator so <a''|a'> = \delta_{a'a''} and we finally have a'\delta_{a'a''}

However this method does no provide the middle expression which has me really thrown off. I am not sure if I am doing everything correct and I do not know how Sakurai came to that. I am also not 100% on what all this means either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ugh I don't know how I just saw what they did. Multiply by the identity operator (a') between <a''| and A. It all falls together then. Still not 100% sure what all it means but I'll work on it.
 
JBrandonS said:
Ugh I don't know how I just saw what they did. Multiply by the identity operator (a') between <a''| and A. It all falls together then. Still not 100% sure what all it means but I'll work on it.

I think this post belongs under Advanced Physics.
 
rude man said:
I think this post belongs under Advanced Physics.

I checked the rules for the advanced physics and it said that just because it's QM doesn't mean it belongs there. So I figured this would be a good place to put it. Either way this question can be closed now as I figured it out. Just can't find out how to mark it for closure.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top