QM: Operator in momentum representation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of operators in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the kinetic energy operator in momentum space and its relation to the use of the 1-operator in different bases.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the connection between two methods of representing operators, questioning how the matrix elements of the kinetic energy operator relate to the 1-operator representation. There is an attempt to clarify the substitution of matrix elements into the operator equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the mathematical expressions involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the operator, but there remains a lack of consensus on the understanding of the highlighted concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of operator representation in quantum mechanics, with specific attention to the implications of using the 1-operator and the assumptions underlying the matrix elements.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi guys

As we have discussed earlier, we can represent some operator in an arbitrary basis by the use of the 1-operator:

<br /> T = \hat{1} T \hat{1} = \sum\limits_{\sigma_a,\sigma_b } {\left| {\psi _{\sigma_a} \left( {r_i } \right)} \right\rangle T_{\sigma_a\sigma_b \right\rangle \left\langle {\psi_{\sigma_b} \left( {r_i } \right)} \right|}<br />

However, in my book they represent the kinetic energy operator in momentum space by the following (disregarding spin)

<br /> \left\langle {{\bf{k}}&#039;} \right|T\left| {\bf{k}} \right\rangle \propto k^2 \delta _{{\bf{k}},{\bf{k}}&#039;}.<br />

I cannot seem to connect these two methods of representing operators in some basis. How can one realize that the book's way of transforming is the same as ours with 1-operators?Niles.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression

<br /> \left\langle {{\bf{k}}&#039;} \right|T\left| {\bf{k}} \right\rangle \propto k^2 \delta _{{\bf{k}},{\bf{k}}&#039;}<br />

is for the matrix elements of T. The corresponding operator could be written as

\hat{T} = \sum_k c k^2 |k\rangle\langle k|,

where c is the proportionality constant (probably 1/(2m)).
 
fzero said:
The expression

<br /> \left\langle {{\bf{k}}&#039;} \right|T\left| {\bf{k}} \right\rangle \propto k^2 \delta _{{\bf{k}},{\bf{k}}&#039;}<br />

is for the matrix elements of T. The corresponding operator could be written as

\hat{T} = \sum_k c k^2 |k\rangle\langle k|,

where c is the proportionality constant (probably 1/(2m)).

Thanks, but how do we know what I have highlighted above? I can see that you have inserted the 1-operator.
 
All I did was substitute the matrix elements into the corresponding version of the equation <br /> <br /> T = \sum\limits_{\sigma_a,\sigma_b } {\left| {\psi _{\sigma_a} \left( {r_i } \right)} \right\rangle T_{\sigma_a\sigma_b \right\rangle \left\langle {\psi_{\sigma_b} \left( {r_i } \right)} \right|}<br /> <br />
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K