QM problem, operators and tensors math

AHolico
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Let \mathbf{S} =\mbox{$\frac {1}{2}$}(\sigma_1 + \sigma_2) be the total spin of a system of two spin-(1/2) particles.

a) Show that \mathbf{P} \equiv (\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{r})^2 / {r^2} is a projection operator

b) Show that tensor operator S_1_2= 2(3P - \mathbf{S}^2) satisfies S_1_2^2 = 4\mathbf{S}^2 - 2S_1_2

c) Show that the eigenvalues of S_1_2 are 0, 2 and -4

--------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm stuck at the first part, and have no idea on how to proceed. I know that if P is a projection operator, then P^2 = P and P^+ = P. So, the first thing I do is expand P to check these properties. First thing I did is getting that r^2 inside of the dot product, leaving me with \mathbf{P} \equiv (\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n})^2, where n is an unitary vector.

\mathbf{S} = \frac{1}{2} (\sigma_1 + \sigma_2) = \frac{1}{2}\left[ \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1\\1 & 0\end{array}\right) + \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & -i\\i & 0\end{array}\right)\right] = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1-i\\1+i & 0\end{array}\right)
\mathbf{n} = \left(\begin{array}{c} cos \theta \\ sin \theta \end{array}\right)
\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1-i\\1+i & 0\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} cos \theta \\ sin \theta \end{array}\right) = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c} sin \theta - i sin \theta\\ cos \theta + i cos \theta \end{array}\right)

Now, to square it... should I (a) just multiply that vector by itself, or (b) multiply it complex conjungate and the vector?

a)\frac {1}{4}\left(sin \theta - i sin \theta , cos \theta + i cos \theta \right) \left( \begin{array}{c} sin \theta - i sin \theta\\ cos \theta + i cos \theta \end{array}\right) = \frac{i}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c} -sin \theta \\ cos \theta \end{array}\right)

I thiunk this is not a proyection operator because P^+ = P.

b)\frac {1}{4}\left(sin \theta + i sin \theta , cos \theta - i cos \theta \right) \left( \begin{array}{c} sin \theta - i sin \theta\\ cos \theta + i cos \theta \end{array}\right) = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c} sin^2 \theta \\ cos^2 \theta \end{array}\right)

But clearly this is not a proyection operator because P^2 = P

In some book I found that \vec{\sigma} \cdot \vec{n} = \sigma_1 sin \theta cos \phi + \sigma_2 sin \theta sin \phi + \sigma_3 cos \theta
If I follow this approach then
\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n} = \frac {1}{2} \sigma_1 cos \theta + \frac {1}{2} \sigma_2 sin \theta
(\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n})^2 = \frac {1}{4} \sigma_1^2 cos^2 \theta + \frac {1}{4} \sigma_2^2 sin^2 \theta + \frac {1}{4} \sigma_1 \sigma_2 sin \theta cos \theta + \frac {1}{4} \sigma_2 \sigma_1 sin \theta cos \theta
(\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n})^2 = \frac {1}{4} \mathbb{I}

The identity matrix is a projection operator, but that constant in front of it is giving me problems. What I'm doing wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by AHolico
\mathbf{S} = \frac{1}{2} (\sigma_1 + \sigma_2) = \frac{1}{2}\left[ \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1\\1 & 0\end{array}\right) + \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & -i\\i & 0\end{array}\right)\right] = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1-i\\1+i & 0\end{array}\right)
\mathbf{n} = \left(\begin{array}{c} cos \theta \\ sin \theta \end{array}\right)
\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1-i\\1+i & 0\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} cos \theta \\ sin \theta \end{array}\right) = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c} sin \theta - i sin \theta\\ cos \theta + i cos \theta \end{array}\right)

Now, to square it... should I (a) just multiply that vector by itself, or (b) multiply it complex conjungate and the vector?

Hold on. It appears that you are not writing P as a vector. If you are working in 2D (are you allowed to assume that?), then you should write P as:

P=(1/2)(Pxi+Pyj)
P=(1/2)[(σ1x+σ2x)i+(σ1y+σ2y)j]

But what you have done here is add the σx and σy without paying attention to the fact that they are components of a vector.

Edit to add: You also seem to be ignoring the fact that you have a 2-particle system. I think you are getting the labels "1" and "2" mixed up with the components of σ, when in fact they are the labels for the spin operators of particles 1 and 2, respectively.
 
Last edited:


Any help will be appreciated.

There are a few mistakes in your calculations. First, the definition of \mathbf{P} should be (\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{r})^2 / r^2, not (\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n})^2 as you have written. This is because we want \mathbf{P} to be a function of the position vector \mathbf{r}, not just a unit vector \mathbf{n}.

Next, your calculation for \mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n} is incorrect. Remember that \mathbf{S} is a matrix, so we can't just multiply it by a vector like \mathbf{n}. Instead, we need to use the dot product formula \mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{B} = A_x B_x + A_y B_y + A_z B_z. In this case, we have \mathbf{S} = \frac{1}{2}(\sigma_1 + \sigma_2) and \mathbf{n} = (sin \theta cos \phi, sin \theta sin \phi, cos \theta). Plugging these into the dot product formula gives

\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{cc}0 & 1-i\\1+i & 0\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c} sin \theta cos \phi\\ sin \theta sin \phi \end{array}\right) = \frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c} sin \theta sin \phi - i sin \theta cos \phi\\ sin \theta cos \phi + i sin \theta sin \phi \end{array}\right)

Squaring this vector gives

(\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{n})^2 = \frac{1}{4}\left(sin^2 \theta sin^2 \phi + sin^2 \theta cos^2 \phi - 2sin \theta cos \theta sin \phi cos \phi \right) = \frac{1}{4}sin^2 \theta

This is not a projection operator because it is not equal to its own square.

To find the correct projection operator, we need
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top