QM Text Recommendation: R. Shankar's "QM" Text

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

R. Shankar's "QM" text is highly recommended for students and self-studiers of quantum mechanics due to its effective introduction of Dirac notation and a solid mathematical foundation in the first 80 pages. The book integrates classical mechanics with historical context, enhancing the learning experience. Comparatively, while D. Bohm's and Linus Pauling's texts are satisfactory, they lack the depth and clarity found in Shankar's work. Other notable recommendations include Sakurai, Griffiths, and the Feynman Lectures, each offering unique perspectives and methodologies in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Dirac notation
  • Basic understanding of classical mechanics
  • Mathematical formulation in physics
  • Experience with self-study techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore R. Shankar's "QM" text for a comprehensive understanding of quantum mechanics
  • Review D. Bohm's and Linus Pauling's quantum mechanics texts for comparative insights
  • Investigate Sakurai's approach to quantum mechanics for advanced concepts
  • Read the Feynman Lectures for detailed explanations and physical examples
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for quantum mechanics students, self-learners, and educators seeking effective textbooks and resources for teaching and understanding quantum mechanics.

graphic7
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
2
This is my first post, by the way. Hello everyone.

I just received R. Shankar's text on QM a few days ago. I am thorougly impressed with the general layout of the book. I've heard introducing Dirac notation first is an excellent idea. The first ~ 80 pages of the book are of a introductory mathematical nature (but nevertheless good, since I'm a self study type). The second chapter consists of classical mechanics with a tad bit of history splashed every once and awhile.

I've made the attempts of reading D. Bohm's (Dover) and Linus Pauling's (Dover, and very ancient) QM texts. Both of these were satisfactory but they lack the touch Shankar gives. I've also been loaned Griffiths and found it a good book as far as conceptual nature goes. But I found it lacking in mathematical formulation as many others have.

All in all, I just wanted to spread the word about Shankar's text to any eager QM student or self-studier.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello!
My favorite QM book is Messiah's book which is also sold from Dover. Although this book has a large volume and is an old book, you may get many important idea about QM.
 
I heard Messiah is quite dated in it's approach. As a reference it may be good to have. Shankar -- as graphic7 says -- is very good as a textbook.
To those looking for a book for self-study, you may find instructive to look at the reviews in Amazon.com
Other books:
Sakurai (good too)
Mersbacher (no opinion)
Feynman Lectures (kind of long but good detailed explanations w/ physical examples)
Griffiths (skips steps, and assigns the derivations to you as exercises. If you are a masochist, or very good at the math, this is the book for you)
A good approach may be to have several books and what you don't understand in one may be explained in more detail in another book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K