QM Text Recommendation: R. Shankar's "QM" Text

graphic7
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
2
This is my first post, by the way. Hello everyone.

I just received R. Shankar's text on QM a few days ago. I am thorougly impressed with the general layout of the book. I've heard introducing Dirac notation first is an excellent idea. The first ~ 80 pages of the book are of a introductory mathematical nature (but nevertheless good, since I'm a self study type). The second chapter consists of classical mechanics with a tad bit of history splashed every once and awhile.

I've made the attempts of reading D. Bohm's (Dover) and Linus Pauling's (Dover, and very ancient) QM texts. Both of these were satisfactory but they lack the touch Shankar gives. I've also been loaned Griffiths and found it a good book as far as conceptual nature goes. But I found it lacking in mathematical formulation as many others have.

All in all, I just wanted to spread the word about Shankar's text to any eager QM student or self-studier.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello!
My favorite QM book is Messiah's book which is also sold from Dover. Although this book has a large volume and is an old book, you may get many important idea about QM.
 
I heard Messiah is quite dated in it's approach. As a reference it may be good to have. Shankar -- as graphic7 says -- is very good as a textbook.
To those looking for a book for self-study, you may find instructive to look at the reviews in Amazon.com
Other books:
Sakurai (good too)
Mersbacher (no opinion)
Feynman Lectures (kind of long but good detailed explanations w/ physical examples)
Griffiths (skips steps, and assigns the derivations to you as exercises. If you are a masochist, or very good at the math, this is the book for you)
A good approach may be to have several books and what you don't understand in one may be explained in more detail in another book.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top