Calculating Magnetic Flux Density in a Solenoid

AI Thread Summary
The magnetic flux density B inside a solenoid is calculated using the formula B = permeability of free space x n x I, where n represents the number of turns per meter. For a solenoid with n = 100 turns/m and I = 2 Amperes, B can be calculated for any length of the solenoid. In a 10 cm length of the same solenoid, the formula remains the same, as the magnetic field strength is uniform along the length of the solenoid. The length of the solenoid does not affect the magnitude of the B-field, as it is determined by the current and the number of turns per unit length. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate calculations in electromagnetism.
ryan9907
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The magnetic flux density B( in tesla ) inside the solenoid and parallel to its axis is given by the expression

B= permeability of free space x n x I, where n is the number of turns per metre length of the solenoid

my question is so for example, if n = 100turns in 1m and I = 2Ampere


in 1m length of solenoid B= permeability of free space x 100 x 2A

how about the B-field in like 10cm of the same solenoid?

i still use the same formula B= permeability of free space x 100 x 2A? or use 10 instead of 100?

2. does the length of solenoid affect the magnitude of B-field in the coil??

thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top