Qualitative Explanation of Range

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmobilerocks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explanation Range
AI Thread Summary
Projectiles can achieve the same range with different launch angles due to the independence of their x and y components of velocity. A larger x-component with a shorter airtime can equal the range of a smaller x-component with a longer airtime. The vertical motion, determined by the y-component, does not affect the horizontal distance traveled. For example, projectiles launched at 45 degrees and 60 degrees can have the same horizontal distance if their initial x-velocities are equal. This illustrates that the trajectory's height and distance can vary while maintaining the same endpoints.
tmobilerocks
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Explain qualitatively how it is possible for the projectiles to have the same range despite having different launch angles


Homework Equations


x = voxt


The Attempt at a Solution


A projectile's range is determined by its x component of the initial velocity and the airtime. A projectile can either have a large x-component of its initial velocity, and a short airtime, or a small x-component of its initial velocity and a long airtime. Therefore, they will have the same range.

Is there a better explanation than this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Qualitatively:

You have to imagine the fact that in let's say a 2-dimensional plane where the projectile flies, there are two perpendicular directions. Because of this fact, the y-component of velocity is completely independent of the x-component. It only controls motion in the vertical direction; try thinking of each component as if the other were set to zero.

For example, if v_{ox} were set to 0, the projectile would go up, then fall right back down. Now if you slowly increase v_{ox} you will basically be spreading out the rise and fall over more space. The rise and fall will still take exactly the same time as if there were no x-component. In the case where there is an x-component it just will not land where it started!


Mathematically:

The same initial x-component of velocity will lead to the same range, because they correspond to different angles. For example let's say you have two different projectiles with the same initial x-velocity:

<br /> v_1=[\hat{x}+\hat{y}] m/s<br />

<br /> v_2=[\hat{x}+\sqrt{3}\hat{y}] m/s<br />

If you haven't been introduced to unit vectors, all these \hat{x},\hat{y} symbols mean basically are x-component and y-component respectively.

So for example with v_1 projectile the initial velocity is 1 m/s in the x-direction, and 1 m/s in the y-direction.

The v_2 projectile has an initial velocity of 1 m/s in the x-direction and \sqrt{3} m/s in the y-direction.

So the second projectile has much more speed in the y-direction than the first projectile. The angle of both can be found from simple trigonometry:

<br /> \theta_1 = \arctan{1} = \frac{\pi}{4} = 45^\circ<br />

<br /> \theta_2 = \arctan{\sqrt{3}} = \frac{\pi}{3} = 60^\circ<br />

So visually you should picture the parabolic path of the projectile, and imagine the two roots of the parabola being it's initial position on the ground, and it's final position. The 45^\circ velocity will be much lower to the ground during its flight but will have the same roots as the parabola that had an initial angle 60^\circ. All that changed was how high it went, which was determined by the differing y-component. The x-component just changed how much over it went, which was in this case exactly the same!

I hope this was clear!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top