Quantum-Dot Fluorescence - Hypothetical Semiconductor

knowlewj01
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a hypothetical semiconductor with band gap 1eV, Relative electron mass is 0.05 and relative hole mass is 0.5.
In a cube-shaped quantum dot of this material with side length L = 3nm, what is the energy associated with a transition from (2 1 1) electron state to the (1 1 1) hole state?

Homework Equations



confinement energy of a particle trapped in a 3D box:

E_n = \left(\frac{h^2}{8mL^2}\right)\left(n_x^2 + n_y^2 + n_z^2\right)


The Attempt at a Solution



so, an electron has been excited into the a higher energy state (2 1 1) from (1 1 1) producing an exciton, the hole remains in state (1 1 1).

the band gap energy E_g = 1eV

the recombination energy is E_r

i have a formula which says that:

E_r = E_g + E_e + E_h

where Ee and Eh are confinement energies of the electron and hole respectively.

do i just sum up Eg Eh and Ee to get the recombination energy?
I would have thought i'd need to work out the difference between the (2 1 1) and (1 1 1) state of the electron.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just summing them up like the formula says, i get 1.525eV for the recombination energy. My quantum is pretty waek, is this right?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top