Quantum harmonic oscillator: ladder operators

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 4K views
tjackson3
Messages
140
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For a particle of mass m moving in the potential [tex]V(x) = \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2x^2[/tex] (i.e. a harmonic oscillator), it is often convenient to express the position and momentum operators in terms of the ladder operators [tex]a_{\pm}[/tex]:

[tex]x = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(a_+ + a_-)[/tex]

[tex]p = i\sqrt{\frac{\hbar m \omega}{2}}(a_+ - a_-)[/tex]

Evaluate [tex]<x>,<x^2>,\sigma_x,<p>,<p^2>,\sigma_p[/tex] for the stationary state [tex]\psi_n[/tex], where n = 0 is the ground state, and check that the uncertainty principle is obeyed.

Note that I'm not asking you guys to help with all six of those; I think just a nudge in the right direction on one of them is all I need. Also note that, according to my professor, it is entirely possible to fully complete this problem without evaluating a single integral.

Homework Equations



[tex]\psi_0 = A_0e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}x^2}[/tex]

[tex]\psi_n = A_n(a_+)^ne^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}x^2}[/tex]

[tex]A_n = \left(\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar}\right)^{1/4} \frac{(-i)^n}{\sqrt{n!(\hbar\omega)^n}}[/tex]

[tex]a_{\pm} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2m}}\left(\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{d}{dx} \pm im\omega x\right)[/tex]

[tex]a_-a_+ - a_+a_- = \hbar\omega[/tex]

[tex]a_-\psi_0 = 0[/tex]

[tex]a_+\psi_n = i\sqrt{(n+1)\hbar\omega}\psi_{n+1}[/tex]

[tex]a_-\psi_n = -i\sqrt{n\hbar\omega}\psi_{n-1}[/tex]

And using this,

[tex]\psi_n = A_n(a_+)^ne^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}x^2}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



All I'm asking for help on is finding <x>. I think if I can do that, the rest will come fairly easily (if not quickly). At first I tried to do it in the most brute force way possible, using the last equation there in section 2, and literally taking [tex]\psi_n^*x\psi_n[/tex], but that went nowhere, due to the computational difficulties and the difficulty in taking the complex conjugate of that expression in a nice, closed form.

The more promising route seemed to be to find <x> for n = 0 and to use that somehow to generate <x> for some general n. <x> = 0 for n = 0 by parity. Unsure of where to go from there, I tried to use that to find <x> at n = 1. Thus I have (note that [tex]\psi^*_0 = \psi_0[/tex]):

[tex]\[a_+\psi_0 = i\sqrt{\hbar\omega}\psi_1\]<br /> <br /> \[\psi_1 = \frac{a_+\psi_0}{i\sqrt{\hbar\omega}}\]\[\psi_1^*x\psi_1 = \frac{a^*_+\psi_0}{-i\sqrt{\hbar\omega}}\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(a_+ + a_-)\frac{a_+\psi_0}{i\sqrt{\hbar\omega}}\][/tex]

I'm stuck here, though, for a couple of reasons. Since operators don't necessarily commute, I'm not sure exactly what liberties I can take in rearranging this into a more convenient form. Additionally, since [tex]a_+[/tex] is an operator, I don't know if it even makes sense to talk about its complex conjugate. Also, short of induction, I don't know how to use this to come up with a formula for a general n.

Thank you so much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second attempt is in the right direction. It is sensible to talk about the conjugate of an operator. You only have to be careful with the order
[tex](a_+\psi)^*= \psi^* a_+^*[/tex]
If you look at the definition of [tex]a_+[/tex] you will find it's conjugate. Then using the commutation relations for the a's you will find a formulat for general n.

By the way, did your professor mention bra-ket notation or hermitian conjugate in the lecture?