Quantum - infinite chain of wells

Toby_phys
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
An electron can tunnel between potential wells. Its state can be written as:


$$
|\psi\rangle=\sum^\infty_{-\infty}a_n|n\rangle
$$

Where $|n \rangle$ is the state at which it is in the $n$th potential well, n increases from left to right.

$$
a_n=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\frac{-i}{3}\right)^{|n|/2}e^{in\pi}
$$

What is the probability of finding the election in well $0$ or above?

Is this probability
$$|a_0|^2+|a_1|^2+...$$
or is it $$|a_0+a_2+...|^2$$?

I am leaning towards the first option but this doesn't use the exponential phase factor. My reasoning is, let $$|\phi \rangle$$ be the superposition of everything 0 and above:
$$
|\phi\rangle=\frac{\sum^{\infty}_{0}a_n|n\rangle}{\sqrt{\sum^{\infty}_0|a_n|^2}}
$$

The denominator normalises everything.
Taking the inner product we get:

$$
\langle\phi|\psi \rangle=\frac{\sum^{\infty}_{0}|a_n|^2}{\sqrt{\sum^{\infty}_0|a_n|^2}}=\sqrt{\sum^{\infty}_0|a_n|^2}
$$

The mod square of this is the sum of the individual probabilities.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Toby_phys said:
Is this probability
$$|a_0|^2+|a_1|^2+...$$
This one.

The phase factor will only be relevant if you start evolving the state with a Hamiltonian that is not diagonal in the given basis or want to know if the system is in a particular state that is a different linear combination.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Toby_phys
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top