Quantum Linear Harmonic Oscillator: Typical Values for x and E | Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter frerk
  • Start date Start date
frerk
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
hello :)

1. Homework Statement


I have to show typical values for length (amplitude) x and energy E of a quantum linear harmonic oscillator

Homework Equations



maybe this one: E = (\frac{1}{2} + n) \hbar\omega with n = 0, 1, 2, ...

But here are 2 unknown variables: E and omega. \hbar = 10^{-34}

and the only equation with has sth. do to with the length is: V(x) = 0,5 m \omega^2 x^2

Thank you for your help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
frerk said:

Homework Statement



I have to show typical values for length (amplitude) x and energy E of a quantum linear harmonic oscillator
That's not a very clear question. Can you write down the question as asked?
frerk said:
\hbar = 10^{-34}
That's only the order of magnitude.
 
That is almost exactly how this task is written. Yes, right, that ist just the order. I try to explain it with a similar easy example: the energy E for an atom is E = \hbar \omega . We know that \hbar = 10^-34 and E is about 1eV = 10^-19 J. So a typical value for omega is 10^-15. And at the task I have to do the same with the lho. Is it more clear now? :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top