Quantum Measurement under Heisenberg Picture?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of quantum measurement within the Heisenberg picture of quantum mechanics, particularly in comparison to the Schrödinger picture. Participants explore the implications of measurement, wave function collapse, and the role of operators in both frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that in the Schrödinger picture, the wave function collapses to an eigenvector of the observable's operator, leading to a corresponding eigenvalue being measured.
  • Others argue that the interpretation of wave function collapse is dependent on the specific interpretation of quantum mechanics, suggesting that not all interpretations include collapse.
  • It is mentioned that, within the minimal version of quantum mechanics, there is no difference in measurement predictions between the Heisenberg and Schrödinger pictures.
  • A question is raised about whether the values measured correspond to the eigenvalues of the dynamical Heisenberg operator.
  • Participants clarify that the measured values are indeed eigenvalues of the Heisenberg operator at the time of measurement.
  • One participant states that all pictures of time evolution are equivalent, emphasizing that interpretations should not depend on the choice of picture.
  • Another participant reiterates that the Heisenberg picture transitions Hamiltonian evolution from states to observables, but state collapse remains a non-Hamiltonian evolution.
  • There is a mention of an update of information represented by a projection of the state during measurement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of wave function collapse and its implications in the Heisenberg picture versus the Schrödinger picture. There is no consensus on the nature of collapse or its significance across different interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference the "minimal" version of quantum mechanics as a basis for the conversation, indicating a limitation in scope regarding interpretations and foundational questions.

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
360
Reaction score
33
TL;DR
What happens during a quantum measurement under Heisenberg picture?
When a quantum measurement occurs under the Schrödinger picture, the wave function collapses to one of the eigenvectors of the operator-observable and the value measured is the corresponding eigenvalue of that eigenvector. What happens during a quantum measurement under the Heisenberg picture where the operator assumes the full time-dependence?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
referframe said:
When a quantum measurement occurs under the Schrödinger picture, the wave function collapses

This is interpretation dependent. Not all interpretations have collapse.

referframe said:
What happens during a quantum measurement under the Heisenberg picture where the operator assumes the full time-dependence?

As far as the minimal version of QM that is within scope for discussion here (discussions of interpretations belong in the QM foundations and interpretations forum), there is no difference between the Heisenberg and Schrödinger pictures as far as predictions of measurement results are concerned.
 
PeterDonis said:
This is interpretation dependent. Not all interpretations have collapse.
As far as the minimal version of QM that is within scope for discussion here (discussions of interpretations belong in the QM foundations and interpretations forum), there is no difference between the Heisenberg and Schrödinger pictures as far as predictions of measurement results are concerned.
Are the values measured also eigenvalues of the dynamical Heisenberg operator?
 
referframe said:
Are the values measured also eigenvalues of the dynamical Heisenberg operator?

They are eigenvalues of the particular operator which is the value of the dynamical Heisenberg operator at the time ##t## at which the measurement is made.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LarryS
Do note that the Heisenberg picture is build from the Schrödinger picture in a way so that they agree in stuff like expectation values.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LarryS
All pictures of time evolution are equivalent (with some care concerning technical issues like Haag's famous theorem). Thus also any interpretation of the theory with regard to physics are independent of the choice of the picture of time evolution. If an interpretation depends on the choice of the picture, it's worthless and does not provide a sound and solid basis for the interpretation of the mathematical formalism in the sense of physics. The only thing an interpretation must provide is a consistent formulation of how the mathematical formalism is related to observations in nature.

[Moderator's note: Off topic content deleted.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
referframe said:
Summary:: What happens during a quantum measurement under Heisenberg picture?

When a quantum measurement occurs under the Schrödinger picture, the wave function collapses to one of the eigenvectors of the operator-observable and the value measured is the corresponding eigenvalue of that eigenvector. What happens during a quantum measurement under the Heisenberg picture where the operator assumes the full time-dependence?

Thanks in advance.
The Heisenberg picture moves the Hamiltonian evolution from the state to the observable. But the collapse is a non-Hamiltonian evolution, so it is not affected by the transition from the Schrödinger to the Heisenberg picture. In other words, if there is a state collapse in the Schrödinger picture, then there is also a state collapse in the Heisenberg picture.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: martinbn
Demystifier said:
But certainly there is an update of information represented by a projection of the state.

See Rule 7 here:

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/the-7-basic-rules-of-quantum-mechanics/

As has been communicated in previous discussions, that Insights article describes the "minimal" version of QM that is the basis for all discussion in this forum. Any discussion of interpretations over and above that belongs in the QM foundations and interpretations forum.
 
Moderator's note: A number of off topic posts about "collapse" have been deleted. Please note my reminder about the forum rules in my previous post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K