Quantum mech question - hydrogen help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yxgao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrogen Quantum
AI Thread Summary
A hydrogen atom in the 2P state transitions to the 1S state, emitting a photon, and the probability distribution of the emitted photon’s direction is given by P(θ, φ) = (3/16π)(1 + cos²(θ)). The discussion highlights confusion regarding the integration of spherical variables and the dependence of transition probabilities on angles. The interaction Hamiltonian is expressed in terms of electric dipole moments, and the matrix element is crucial for understanding the transition. Participants suggest using spherical harmonics to clarify the wavefunction representation for the hydrogen atom's states. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of quantum mechanics and the need for clear explanations in solving such problems.
yxgao
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Hi, can someone help me with this problem?
A hydrogen atom is in the 2P state with n=2, l=1, m=1. It emits a photon and makes a transition to the 1S state (n=1, l=0, m=0).

The question is what is the probability distribution of the direction (\theta , \phi) of the emitted photon?

The answer is:
P(\theta , \phi)=\frac{3}{16\pi} (1+(cos(\theta)^{2})

Thanks!






The solution is not very clear but the following facts may be helpful. Can someone please explain this problem clearly to me? I am having a very difficult time understanding this.

The electric field can be expressed in terms of creation and annihilation operators of photons in a box of volume V.

We know that the interaction is H_{I} = \vec{E} \cdot \vec{d} = -e \vec{E} \cdot \vec{r} (d is electric dipole moment) so we know the matrix element of a photon is:
<i|H_{I}|f> = -e\sqrt{\frac{\hbar c k}{2 \epsilon_0 V}} <2P|\vec{\epsilon} \cdot \vec{r} | 1S>

From here, I don't understand what to do. If you can find a similar problem worked out online that would be helpful as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's something divious with your problem:if the transition probability is given by the time-dependent perturbation matrix element squared:

P_{i\rightarrow f}=|\langle i|\hat{H}_{int}|f\rangle|^{2}
,then it shouldn't depend of the spherical angles.It should be a number between 0 and 1.After all,that integration,on normal basis,assumes integration wrt to all 3 spherical variables.
Maybe the problem asks for the matrix element computed only as integral over 'r' from 0 to infty and letting the spherical variables nonintegrated.In that case:
P_{i\rightarrow f}=\int d\Omega' P(\theta',\phi')

P_{i\rightarrow f}=|\langle i|\hat{H}_{int}|f\rangle|^{2}=\langle i|\hat{H}_{int}|f\rangle\langle f|\hat{H}_{int}|i\rangle
=[\int d\Omega' \int_{0}^{+\infty}dr' \psi_{i}^{*}(r',\theta',\phi') \hat{H}_{int} \psi_{f}(r',\theta',\phi')][\int d\Omega'' \int_{0}^{+\infty}dr'' \psi_{f}^{*}(r'',\theta'',\phi'') \hat{H}_{int} \psi_{i}(r'',\theta'',\phi'')]
=\int d\Omega' P(\theta',\phi')

U (actually I :-p ) have found:
P(\theta',\phi')=[\int_{0}^{+\infty}dr' \psi_{i}^{*}(r',\theta',\phi') \hat{H}_{int} \psi_{f}(r',\theta',\phi')][\int d\Omega'' \int_{0}^{+\infty}dr'' \psi_{f}^{*}(r'',\theta'',\phi'') \hat{H}_{int} \psi_{i}(r'',\theta'',\phi'')]

Use the formula u have for the matrix element and treat those 2 vectors (one being the polarization vector of the emitted radiation,and the other the position vector of the electron) involved in the scalar product wrt to their spherical components.Make use of the fact that the polarization vector has modulus equal to unity.That scalar product should be 'r'.Then the angle dependence will be given only by the spherical harmonic of the initial state ('1s' orbital has no angle dependence).Hopefully u'll get the answer the problem gives u.

Daniel.
 
Hrmmm, I am not sure what to think about the reply to this topic. When I read the question, it seems to me that the answer looks like (sort of, I don't have them memorized) something to do with the squares of spherical harmonics. This makes some sense to me since you can write the solution to the simple model of the hydrogen atom as a product of a radial component and the spherical harmonics. Many third and fourth year undergraduates have been tortured by this kind of fun stuff. I don't really want to work through any details here, but i sugest looking towards this method of representing the wavefunctions of each level of the hydrogen atom. Not sure if this was any help...


Philcorp
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top