Quantum Mechanical Tunneling Probability

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the quantum mechanical tunneling probability of a 2-gram object encountering a barrier of height 20 cm and width 2.0 cm. Participants agree that the probability of tunneling is negligible due to the object's mass being approximately 10^27 times greater than that of an electron. The conversation highlights the inadequacy of applying Schrödinger's wave-function to macroscopic objects, emphasizing the classical description of such entities. The consensus suggests that while the tunneling probability is theoretically calculable, it remains practically insignificant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically tunneling phenomena.
  • Familiarity with Schrödinger's equation and wave-function interpretation.
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics and mass-energy equivalence.
  • Basic grasp of probability theory as it applies to quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical formulation of quantum tunneling probability using the Schrödinger equation.
  • Explore the implications of quantum mechanics on macroscopic objects and the classical limit.
  • Study the concept of wave-particle duality and its relevance to tunneling.
  • Investigate experimental evidence of quantum tunneling in various physical systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify the distinctions between quantum and classical descriptions of physical phenomena.

Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
I recently took an exam in which the professor asked the following question:

Suppose an object of mass 2 grams were incident on a rectangular barrier of height 20 cm and width 2.0 cm. What is the probability that the object will quantum mechanically tunnel and appear on the other side?

I argued that since this object has a mass on the order of 10^27 times greater than the electron that qualitatively the probability would be negligible. Furthermore I argued that such a macroscopic object could be described classically so why would we describe such an object by a wave-function propagating in space? I'd like to hear your ideas on the matter and see what others say. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say that you're right, it's "negligible", but your professor probably wanted you to come up with a number. You have to play to the audience. :smile:

I'd also say that Schrödinger quantum mechanics is intended to describe a point particle, and treating a 2 gram object as if it were a point particle is pretty hokey. What if half the object penetrated the barrier and the other half did not?
 

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K