Quantum Mechanics Effects: Proton vs Up Quark

  • Thread starter Thread starter susskind99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effects Qm
susskind99
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I'm pretty sure a proton's location does not have much quantum uncertainty but an up quark does. So qm uncertainty begins around 10^-15m and is full blown at 10^-18m

If my numbers are wrong please let me know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
susskind99 said:
I'm pretty sure a proton's location does not have much quantum uncertainty but an up quark does. So qm uncertainty begins around 10^-15m and is full blown at 10^-18m

If my numbers are wrong please let me know.

Your assumptions are wrong. We have seen interference effects on not only protons, but also molecules as big as buckyballs.

Thus, quantum effects (and consequently, the HUP) apply to protons and much bigger sizes.

Zz.
 
The uncertainty of the position x of a quantum object in a certain state psi can be calculated as

##\Delta x^2 = \langle\psi|(x-\bar{x})^2|\psi\rangle##

Usually what you find is an uncertainty comparable to the typical size S of the quantum system. So the uncertainty of an electron in an atom / of a proton inside a nucleus / of a quark inside a proton is comparable to the size S of the atom / nucleus / proton.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
tom.stoer said:
Usually what you find is an uncertainty comparable to the typical size S of the quantum system. So the uncertainty of an electron in an atom / of a proton inside a nucleus / of a quark inside a proton is comparable to the size S of the atom / nucleus / proton.
By definition. The "size of a quantum system" is defined by the uncertainty of the position of its constituents. We say an atom is an Angstrom in diameter because that describes the region in which the electrons can be found.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Bill_K said:
By definition. The "size of a quantum system" is defined by the uncertainty of the position of its constituents. We say an atom is an Angstrom in diameter because that describes the region in which the electrons can be found.
No, by experiment ;-)

We see structures in scattering experiments which can be (approximately) explained by (e.g.) charge distributions. The typical size of these distributions can be derived from the experiments. The calculations result in comparable sizes, thefore the idea of what "size" could mean, the experimental results and the definitions used in QM agree.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Back
Top