Quantum Mechanics (finding the Hamiltonian of a quantum top)

MelissaM
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This was part of my midterm exam that i couldn't solve.
Any help is extremely appreciated.

Problem: The K.E. of a rotating top is given as L^2/2I where L is its angular momentum and I is its moment of inertia. Consider a charged top placed at a constant magnetic field. Assume that the magnetic momentum of the top is proportional to L, M=KL (K is a cst that can be derived from the classical distribution of the charge that is known). Write the Hamiltonian for the quantum top and find the energy eigenstates and energy eigenvalues of the quantum top.This is what i wrote during the exam:

T= L^2/2I and V= -M.B (where B is the magnetic field)
so H=L^2/2I -M.B = L^2/2I - KL.B

then i said since it's a rotating top let's suppose that B is along the z-axis which limits our L to L_z
then, H= L_z( L_z/2I - K.B_z)

and i stopped there.

Now looking calmly at the problem, i realized that i absolutely looked over the fact that it is charged. I think i need to be using A ( the electrostatic potential) along with B but still i have no idea how to start...



Please any help would be awesome!

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maybe i should use : H= 1/2m (p-q.A)^2 + qφ but since V=0 ⇒ H= 1/2m × (p - q.A)^2
 
MelissaM said:
maybe i should use : H= 1/2m (p-q.A)^2 + qφ but since V=0 ⇒ H= 1/2m × (p - q.A)^2

Hi melissa, I think you were on the right track? Because
MelissaM said:
maybe i should use : H= 1/2m (p-q.A)^2 + qφ but since V=0 ⇒ H= 1/2m × (p - q.A)^2

Hi melissa, if you start from your generic hamiltonian:

$$\hat{H} = \frac{(p-q A)^2}{ 2 m}$$

you'll just arrive at the generic Hamiltonian below:

$$\hat{H} \approx {p^2 \over 2m} + K B \cdot L + ... = {L^2 \over 2 I} + K B \cdot L$$

See http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bds10/aqp/lec5_compressed.pdf

This is your original hamiltonian which is correct.

Suppose B is oriented a particular direction: Then rotate your basis so that B is in the z direction ( Because the kinetic term has no preferred direction it can be diagonalized in any direction of space). Then your eigenstates are now
$$|l_z \rangle$$

with energy following properties:

$$ L^2 | l_z \rangle = \hbar^2 l_z (l_z + 1) | l_z \rangle$$

I think you know how the rest looks like from here.
 
  • Like
Likes MelissaM
paralleltransport said:
Hi melissa, I think you were on the right track? BecauseHi melissa, if you start from your generic hamiltonian:

$$\hat{H} = \frac{(p-q A)^2}{ 2 m}$$

you'll just arrive at the generic Hamiltonian below:

$$\hat{H} \approx {p^2 \over 2m} + K B \cdot L + ... = {L^2 \over 2 I} + K B \cdot L$$

See http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bds10/aqp/lec5_compressed.pdf

This is your original hamiltonian which is correct.

Suppose B is oriented a particular direction: Then rotate your basis so that B is in the z direction ( Because the kinetic term has no preferred direction it can be diagonalized in any direction of space). Then your eigenstates are now
$$|l_z \rangle$$

with energy following properties:

$$ L^2 | l_z \rangle = \hbar^2 l_z (l_z + 1) | l_z \rangle$$

I think you know how the rest looks like from here.
Yes absolutely.
Thank you for the help!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top