Quantum Mechanics: Is Math a Necessity?

AI Thread Summary
Understanding quantum mechanics requires a solid foundation in mathematics, particularly in areas such as calculus, differential equations, and linear algebra. While some introductory materials may present concepts without heavy math, a genuine grasp of quantum mechanics necessitates mathematical knowledge to avoid misconceptions. For those without extensive math backgrounds, starting with an introductory modern physics textbook aimed at students with basic calculus knowledge is advisable. These resources typically introduce essential mathematical concepts while providing historical context and experimental background, making them suitable for beginners before tackling more advanced quantum mechanics texts.
Liger20
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was just wondering, is quantum mechanics something that you have to have lots of background in math, or can it be understood by someone without significant math education? I've never learned calculus, but I'm planning on starting to learn it very soon. I was thinking about watching some lectures online by Leonard Susskind. Should I wait a long time, will I be pulling my hair out if I even attempt it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You won't get very far without knowing differential equations.
 
I found it to be a healthy mix of various different math subjects... Linear algebra...some crazy highly abstract form of linear algebra, ODE's, little bit of PDE's and boundary value problems (so yes to calculus), a jumbled up mix of all of the above, and a lot of cursing (yes, I do consider that to be a form of math). And that was just a first introductory class...

Edit: If you are learning it on your own, I bet there are some less math-intensive reading material explaining some of the ideas of quantum mechanics. Unfortunately I'm not sure what those are. Perhaps a modern physics text or something...
 
Last edited:
Before diving into a full-bore QM textbook, you should consider starting with an intro modern physics book aimed at second-year students (i.e. right after the "general physics" course). These books are aimed at students who have had basic calculus but probably have not had multivariable calculus or differential equations yet. They try to introduce enough of those topics to get started on QM, and usually show how to solve Schrödinger's equation for the basic "particle in a box,", then discuss more advanced situations such as the hydrogen atom in at least a schematic way.

These books also give you a lot more about the historical and experimental background to QM than a "real" QM textbook usually gives you.
 
Last edited:
You need the math.
 
Without math you can only learn some diluted version of quantum mechanics that tends to be misleading rather than helping you in learning the "real" quantum mechanics.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top