Quantum mechanics operator manipulation

Tom_12
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


consider operator defined as \hat{O_A} = \hat{A} -<\hat{A}>
show that (ΔA)^2=<\hat{O_A}^2>

Homework Equations


(ΔA)^2=<\hat{A}^2>-<\hat{A}>^2


The Attempt at a Solution


(ΔA)^2=<\hat{A}^2>-<\hat{A}>^2
= <\hat{A}^2> - (\hat{A} -\hat{O_A})^2
= <\hat{A}^2> - \hat{A}^2 + 2\hat{A}<\hat{O_A}> - \hat{O_A}^2

or

\hat{O_A} = \hat{A} -<\hat{A}>

\hat{O_A}^2 = (\hat{A} -<\hat{A}>)^2

\hat{O_A}^2 = \hat{A}^2-2\hat{A}<\hat{A}>+\hat{A}^2

But I don't know how to convert the operator \hat{O_A} into the expectation value <\hat{O_A}>...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tom_12 said:
\hat{O_A} = \hat{A} -<\hat{A}>

\hat{O_A}^2 = (\hat{A} -<\hat{A}>)^2

\hat{O_A}^2 = \hat{A}^2-2\hat{A}<\hat{A}>+\hat{A}^2

But I don't know how to convert the operator \hat{O_A} into the expectation value <\hat{O_A}>...?

What happens when the expectation of both sides of the last line is taken?
 
George Jones said:
What happens when the expectation of both sides of the last line is taken?

Does this happen:

<\hat{O_A}^2> = <\hat{A}^2>-2<\hat{A}><\hat{A}>+<\hat{A}>^2

<\hat{O_A}^2> = <\hat{A}^2>-2<\hat{A}>^2+<\hat{A}>^2

<\hat{O_A}^2> = (ΔA)^2...?

I am not sure what happens when you take the expectation value of a term that is already an expectation value, does it just remains unchanged?
 
An expectation value is just a number, so yes, it remains unchanged.
 
Oh yes, of course. Thank you.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top