Quantum mechanics particle in a well

kcasali
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given is an infinite square well potential. V=infinity at x=a, x=-a. V=0 between -a and a. Take an even state u=Ccos(kx), and find <x>,<x^2>,<p_x>, and <(p_x)^2>. Your final answers should not contain k, which will be eliminated by the boundary conditions.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I'm really just generally confused by this question, and I need a nudge in the right direction.

I know how to find the wavefunction and energy if the well is between 0 and a, how do I find it between -a and a? Can I just redefine the coordinate system so that the well is between 0 and 2a? Also, what does he mean by an even state? That the energy is in an even state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What boundary conditions did you use when you solved the problem in the case where the well is 0 and a? My guess is that you required that the wavefunction go to zero at 0 an a. Do the same for -a and a and you should be ok. An even state means that the quantum number is even.
 
Amok said:
An even state means that the quantum number is even.
That's not correct for this problem.

An even state is where the wave function is even, i.e. f(x)=f(-x).
 
True, sorry about that.
 
I figured it out, thanks for the help. :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top