Quantum Mechanics Scattering problem, 2 particles elastic collision

PineApple2
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Hi. First of all, this question seems a bit obscure to me (like there are data missing) However, I quote it as it appeared in the source, so probably there aren't. Second, it is a question from a previous exam, so it is not graded or anything, and there is no problem helping me solving it...:smile:
After this preliminary, here is the question:

Homework Statement


Two spinless particles are colliding elastically.
(a) Write a formal expression for the total scattering cross section as a sum of partial waves.

(b) We are given that the cross section has resonance at all angles except for when the particles collide at 90o. Far from resonance, the differential cross section is isotropic. If we write the scattering problem as a sum of partial waves, what angular momentum states correspond to the given conditions?

(c) Assume scattering with low energy such that the only contribution to the cross section comes from the two lowest channels. Rewrite the solution to section (a) given the condition you derived at section (b).

(d) What is the corresponding phase shift for a resonance?

(e) Given that when the two particles collide at 90o in resonance, the phase shift is 45o. The momentum at resonance is k_R. Use the results of sections (a)-(d) to calculate the total cross section in resonance.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok. My attempt goes like this.

(a) The known expression for the cross section in terms of partial waves is:
<br /> \sigma_{tot} = \frac{4\pi}{k^2}\sum_{\ell=0}^{\infty}(2\ell+1)sin^2\delta_{\ell}(k)<br />
(no derivation here. I didn't take into account anything related to 2 particles...)

(b) In order to meet the given condition that \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} diverges for every angle except for 90o. This must be the case with f_{\ell} as well (since \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}=|f_{\ell}|^2). So we need to assemble such a state that would make f_{\ell} diverge for all angles except 90o. From here I am not sure how to continue...

(c) depends on section (b)

(d) The phase shift is 90o as is always the case with a resonance. Am I wrong?

(e) If one particle is scattered at an angle \theta, the other one is scattered at \frac{\pi}{2}-\theta. So according to
\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}=|f(\theta)+f(\pi/2-\theta)|^2 (which is true for identical particles, a fact that we are not given) we need an angular momentum state that vanishes for each pair of angles \theta and \frac{\pi}{2}-\theta. Such a state could maybe consist of Y_2^0 (in which \cos^2(\pi/2-\theta)=\sin^2(\theta) and so it cancels the angular dependence. Then adding up an appropriate factor of Y_0^0 would cancel out the scattering amplitude.

These are all sort of guesses. I am not sure about this question at all. I will be very happy for remarks on this and/or other suggestions.

Thanks!

<br /> <br />
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No one? Please?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top