Quantum Mechanics - Two spin 1/2 particles

Tangent87
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
How do we show that the state |\chi>=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|\uparrow>|\downarrow>-|\downarrow>|\uparrow>) has total spin zero? Does it involve acting some combination of the spin operators on it?

I know that the total spin operator \underline{S^2}=S_x^2+S_y^2+S_z^2=\frac{3\hbar^2}{4}I where I is the 2x2 identity matrix but I don't see how that helps.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For two particles you should use

S_{12}=S_1\otimes S_2

For each spin component. So, for S_z it will be easy. For S^2_x+S^2_y you play with S_x+iS_y[/tex] and its conjugate, their commutations with S_z, or you can play with the explicit form of states and matrices.
 
Act on it with the operator:

<br /> \hat{S}^{2} = \hat{S}^{2}_{1} + \hat{S}^{2}_{2} + 2 (\hat{\mathbf{S}}_{1} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{S}}_{2})<br />

and express the dot product with the ladder operators:

<br /> (\hat{\mathbf{S}}_{1} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{S}}_{2}) = \hat{S}_{1 x} \hat{S}_{2 x} + \hat{S}_{1 y} \hat{S}_{2 y} + \hat{S}_{1 z} \hat{S}_{2 z}<br />
<br /> = \frac{1}{4} \left[\left(\hat{S}_{1 +} + \hat{S}_{1 -}\right) \left(\hat{S}_{2 +} + \hat{S}_{2 -}\right) - \left(\hat{S}_{1 +} - \hat{S}_{1 -}\right) \left(\hat{S}_{2 +} - \hat{S}_{2 -}\right)\right] + \hat{S}_{1 z} \hat{S}_{2 z}<br />
<br /> = \frac{1}{2} \left(\hat{S}_{1 +} \hat{S}_{2 -} + \hat{S}_{1 -} \hat{S}_{2 +}\right) + \hat{S}_{1 z} \hat{S}_{2 z}<br />

You should get:

<br /> \hat{S}^{2} |\chi\rangle = S (S + 1) |\chi\rangle<br />

What value for S do you get?
 
Thank you for your help, I get \hat{S}^{2} |\chi\rangle = 0, I take it that's correct as it's supposed to be a state of total spin 0? Is there no easier way to do it though as it took quite a bit of work and I see the result stated in so many textbooks as if it's obvious?
 
There is, through the use of Young tableaux.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top